You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 13, Issue 2
  • The challenge of cross-cultural collaborative research: lessons learnt from a pilot case–crossover study of severe occupational hand trauma in the People’s Republic of China

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Brief report
The challenge of cross-cultural collaborative research: lessons learnt from a pilot case–crossover study of severe occupational hand trauma in the People’s Republic of China
  1. Kezhi Jin1,2,
  2. David A Lombardi2,3,
  3. Theodore K Courtney2,3,
  4. Gary S Sorock4,
  5. Melissa J Perry3,
  6. Hong Chen5,
  7. Xin Wang5,
  8. Youxin Liang1
  1. 1School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, PRC
  2. 2Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  4. 4Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  5. 5Ningbo No 6 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, PRC
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr K Jin
 Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA;Jin.kezhi{at}libertymutual.com

Abstract

Objective: A pilot epidemiologic study was conducted in the People’s Republic of China to assess the feasibility of applying the study protocol from a US case–crossover study on transient work-related exposures and the risk of an acute occupational hand injury.

Design: Injured workers were recruited from a hand surgery center in Ningbo, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China. A structured face-to-face interview questionnaire was administered.

Results: 156 workers with hand injury completed the study (73% men). The enrollment rate was 91%. Of those who refused participation, most indicated their reluctance was due to the requirement to sign the written consent form. Considerable variability was found among interviewers in ascertaining responses from participants to important exposure questions (21.3% v 97%).

Conclusions: Recommendations include the following: (1) exploring effective oral-consent protocols that reduce participant concern and still meet human participant protection requirements; (2) using non-physician interviewers; and (3) increasing the intensity and standardization of interviewer training.

  • PRC, People’s Republic of China

https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2006.012534

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Funding: This work was supported by the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA and the Fudan University School of Public Health, Shanghai, PRC.

    • Competing interests: None.