<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com">
<title>Injury Prevention recent issues</title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com</link>
<description>Injury Prevention RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Injury Prevention</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1353-8047</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/e2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/75?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/81?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/88?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/94?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/129?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/130?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/132?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/133?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/147?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.injuryprevention.bmj.com/homepage/IP_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.injuryprevention.bmj.com/homepage/IP_95x60.gif">
<title>Injury Prevention</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.injuryprevention.bmj.com/homepage/IP_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/e2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The 6-PACK programme to decrease falls and fall-related injuries in acute hospitals: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/e2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Falls are a common hospital occurrence complicating the care of patients. From an economic perspective, the impact of in-hospital falls and related injuries is substantial. However, few studies have examined the economic implications of falls prevention interventions in an acute care setting. The 6-PACK programme is a targeted nurse delivered falls prevention programme designed specifically for acute hospital wards. It includes a risk assessment tool and six simple strategies that nurses apply to patients classified as high-risk by the tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine the incremental cost-effectiveness of the 6-PACK programme for the prevention of falls and fall-related injuries, compared with usual care practice, from an acute hospital perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and design</st>
<p>The 6-PACK project is a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) that includes 24 acute medical and surgical wards from six hospitals in Australia to investigate the efficacy of the 6-PACK programme. This economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the 6-PACK cluster RCT. Outcome and hospitalisation cost data will be prospectively collected on approximately 16 000 patients admitted to the participating wards during the 12-month trial period. The results of the economic evaluation will be expressed as &lsquo;cost or saving per fall prevented&rsquo; and &lsquo;cost or saving per fall-related injury prevented&rsquo; calculated from differences in mean costs and effects in the intervention and control groups, to generate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This economic evaluation will provide an opportunity to explore the cost-effectiveness of a targeted nurse delivered falls prevention programme for reducing in-hospital falls and fall-related injuries. This protocol provides a detailed statement of a planned economic evaluation conducted alongside a cluster RCT to investigate the efficacy of the 6-PACK programme to prevent falls and fall-related injuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The protocol for the cluster RCT is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12611000332921).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morello, R., Barker, A., Zavarsek, S., Watts, J. J., Haines, T., Hill, K., Sherrington, C., Brand, C., Jolley, D., Stoelwinder, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040302</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040302</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The 6-PACK programme to decrease falls and fall-related injuries in acute hospitals: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Study protocol</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e2</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A consideration of severity is sufficient to focus our prevention efforts]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Molcho and Pickett<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> suggest that it is unrealistic and counterproductive to try and prevent all childhood injury. We agree, welcome this contribution and support the intent of their article to facilitate debate and discussion around the issue.</p> <p>We agree with their view that the dominant paradigm in injury control is that all childhood injuries, irrespective of their origins, are unacceptable. We would argue this paradigm extends to all age groups. Taken to its extreme, this position does not, however, stand up to scrutiny. Are the proponents seriously suggesting we seek to prevent even the mildest of injuries? For example, a child tripping over and sustaining a barely visible abrasion to her arm but nevertheless is crying as a result. We believe most parents would probably briefly console the child and once the crying had abated encourage them to continue playing and then completely forget about the incident.</p>...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Langley, J., Cryer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040278</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040278</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A consideration of severity is sufficient to focus our prevention efforts]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/75?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Speed cameras in an urban setting: a cost-benefit analysis]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/75?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>To perform a cost&ndash;benefit analysis of the installation of speed cameras on the beltways of Barcelona.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The analysis was performed from the society perspective over a 2-year period using a controlled before-and-after study design. The net benefit was calculated using, as benefits, the willingness to pay for the estimated number of people who avoided injury as a consequence of the intervention, subtracting costs and savings. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the maximum and minimum estimated number of people who avoided injury, assuming that there was a minimum of one death avoided, using the maximum value of a statistical life, assigning all implementation costs to the first year and assuming there was no time lost due to speed reduction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Base case results showed a net benefit of 6.8 million. Sensitivity analyses suggested that net benefits could range from 5.6 to 23.1 million over 2&nbsp;years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The use of speed cameras in urban areas has a favourable economic impact even when assessed using conservative assumptions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendivil, J., Garcia-Altes, A., Perez, K., Mari-Dell'Olmo, M., Tobias, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2010.030882</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;ip.2010.030882</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Speed cameras in an urban setting: a cost-benefit analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/81?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neighbourhood street connectivity and injury in youth: a national study of built environments in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/81?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The influence of the built environment on health is of contemporary societal interest. The design of streets in neighbourhood settings may contribute positively to the health of populations through increased physical activity, but it may also have injury consequences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a national cross-sectional study to describe the injury experiences of 9021 students from 180 Canadian schools that participated in the 2006 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children survey. Street designs surrounding each school (5&nbsp;km circular buffer) were estimated via geographic information systems for three established measures of connectivity (intersection density, average block length and connected node ratio). A composite scale of connectivity was derived using factor analysis. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between the composite connectivity measure and students' reports of physical activity injuries occurring in the street (street injuries).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Students living in neighbourhoods with low versus high street connectivity reported possible increases in the occurrence of street injuries (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.26). This relationship was mainly attributable to the occurrence of bicycle injuries (52% of all street injuries; OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.28 to 4.25). The population attributable risk was 20% for street injuries potentially caused by living in an area with low connectivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The design of streets, as a measure of the built environment, is related to the occurrence of youth injury. Positive effects of poorly connected street designs that are likely in terms of physical activity were offset by negative injury outcomes, although the injuries observed were mostly minor in nature.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mecredy, G., Janssen, I., Pickett, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040011</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040011</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neighbourhood street connectivity and injury in youth: a national study of built environments in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>87</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/88?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency department coding of bicycle and pedestrian injuries during the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/88?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The international classification of diseases version 10 (ICD-10) uses alphanumeric expanded codes and external cause of injury codes (E-codes).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine the reliability and validity of emergency department (ED) coders in applying E-codes in ICD-9 and -10.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Bicycle and pedestrian injuries were identified from the ED information system from one period before and two periods after transition from ICD-9 to -10 coding. Overall, 180 randomly selected bicycle and pedestrian injury charts were reviewed as the reference standard (RS). Original E-codes assigned by ED coders (ICD-9 in 2001 and ICD-10 in 2004 and 2007) were compared with charts (validity) and also to ICD-9 and -10 codes assigned from RS chart review, to each case by an independent (IND) coder (reliability). Sensitivity, specificity, simple, and chance-corrected agreements ( statistics) were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sensitivity of E-coding bicycle injuries by the IND coder in comparison with the RS ranged from 95.1% (95% CI 86.3 to 99.0) to 100% (95% CI 94.0 to 100.0) for both ICD-9 and -10. Sensitivity of ED coders in E-coding bicycle injuries ranged from 90.2% (95% CI 79.8 to 96.3) to 96.7% (95% CI 88.5 to 99.6). The sensitivity estimates for the IND coder ranged from 25.0% (95% CI 14.7 to 37.9) to 45.0% (95% CI 32.1 to 58.4) for pedestrian injuries for both ICD-9 and -10.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Bicycle injuries are coded in a reliable and valid manner; however, pedestrian injuries are often miscoded as falls. These results have important implications for injury surveillance research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karkhaneh, M., Hagel, B. E., Couperthwaite, A., Saunders, L. D., Voaklander, D. C., Rowe, B. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2010.031302</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;ip.2010.031302</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Unlocked]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency department coding of bicycle and pedestrian injuries during the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>88</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/94?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of helmet use by users of bicycles, push scooters, inline skates and skateboards in Toronto and the surrounding area in the absence of comprehensive legislation: an observational study]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/94?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Legislation in the province of Ontario, Canada, mandates users under the age of 18 to wear a helmet when they ride a bicycle, and legislation has been shown to significantly increase rates of bicycle helmet use. Legislation does not exist in Ontario for older bicyclists or for users of other non-motorised modes of transportation, and there are no current data available regarding rates of helmet use in these categories. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of helmet use among users of bicycles, skateboards, push scooters and inline skates in Toronto, Ontario, and the surrounding area. Further analysis was performed to examine factors associated with helmet use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed a cross-sectional, observational study. Three trained, stationary observers captured 6038 users of bicycles (5783), skateboards (77), inline skates (165) and push scooters (13) in the summer of 2009. Observations were separated into three time periods capturing commuters, midday users and recreational users. A general linear model was used to assess the factors associated with helmet use among bicyclists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Helmets were worn by 48.9% of all users observed and 50.0% of all bicyclists. Among bicyclists, females were more likely to wear helmets than males (prevalence ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.36), while children were significantly more likely to wear helmets than adults (prevalence ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.15). Significant behavioural variation was observed among users during the three observation periods (p&lt;0.001), with commuters being the most likely to wear a helmet.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In the absence of comprehensive legislation encompassing all ages of users, only half of users of non-motorised, wheeled transportation devices are choosing to wear a helmet to protect against traumatic brain injury. Implementation of evidence-based strategies to increase helmet use, such as the introduction of legislation encompassing all ages and all equipment, is required.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Page, J. L., Macpherson, A. K., Middaugh-Bonney, T., Tator, C. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of helmet use by users of bicycles, push scooters, inline skates and skateboards in Toronto and the surrounding area in the absence of comprehensive legislation: an observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proximity to vacant buildings is associated with increased fire risk in Baltimore, Maryland, homes]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Fires and burns are a leading cause of unintentional injury death in the USA. Although it has been anecdotally reported that vacant dwellings are at a higher risk for fire, the association between vacancy and fire risk at the individual household level has not been empirically measured.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In this cross-sectional study, geocoded residential vacant properties (VP) and fire events are analysed in Baltimore City at the census tract level and the individual household level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>On average, a 10% increase in the proportion of vacancies in a census tract was associated with a 9.9% increase in fires (95% CI: 5% to 15%). Random-effects Poisson models, controlling for housing and neighbourhood conditions, found contagion effects. The risk of fire in an occupied dwelling increased by 8% (95% CI: 1% to 10%) for every vacant structure within 10&nbsp;m, and the risk of fire decreased by half (95% CI: 45% to 62%) for every km between an occupied dwelling and vacant building. Close proximity to VP was associated with trash fires within dwellings (p=0.039) and structure fires (p=0.012).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We believe that this is the first study to demonstrate increased risk posed by nearby VP at the household level, confirming earlier ecological analyses of the role of VP as strong correlates of home fires. Measurement of this risk can motivate property owners, policy makers and insurers to invest in risk reduction measures that include building maintenance and trash removal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schachterle, S. E., Bishai, D., Shields, W., Stepnitz, R., Gielen, A. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040022</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040022</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proximity to vacant buildings is associated with increased fire risk in Baltimore, Maryland, homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unintentional paediatric ingestion poisonings and the role of imitative behaviour]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To quantify the relationship between imitative behaviour and poisonings in children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study is based on the evaluation of a large national database of unintentional oral ingestion poisonings involving children aged &lt;5 years treated in US hospital emergency departments during 2004 and 2005. It begins with the premise that, among other factors, oral drug poisonings can result from children observing and imitating adult behaviour, but that non-oral drug and non-drug poisonings (to be referred to as non-drug poisonings) generally do not, because children do not see adults ingesting non-drug products. The study then compares and contrasts the child poisonings between the two poisoning categories. Differences in the poisoning rate between the oral drug and non-drug categories are estimated by the age and sex of the children. A binary logistic regression analysis is also conducted using non-drug poisonings as a control group to compare against oral drug poisonings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was a significant increase in the relative likelihood of oral drug poisonings beginning at age 20&ndash;23 months that is consistent with the expected onset of complicated imitative behaviours in children. Based upon our analysis, imitative behaviour may have contributed to about 17 300 child poisonings treated annually in the emergency department, possibly accounting for about 20% of poisonings involving children aged &lt;5 years and 30% of the poisoning injuries involving children aged 20&ndash;59 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Comprehensive efforts to prevent poisoning need to address the problem of imitative behaviour in children. Caregivers should never ingest medications in the presence of children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodgers, G. B., Franklin, R. L., Midgett, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040008</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040008</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Poisoning/Injestion]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unintentional paediatric ingestion poisonings and the role of imitative behaviour]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The comparative behaviour of two combat boots under impact]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Improvised explosive devices have become the characteristic weapon of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. While little can be done to mitigate against the effects of blast in free-field explosions, scaled blast simulations have shown that the combat boot can attenuate the effects on the vehicle occupants of anti-vehicular mine blasts. Although the combat boot offers some protection to the lower limb, its behaviour at the energies seen in anti-vehicular mine blast has not been documented previously.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The sole of eight same-size combat boots from two brands currently used by UK troops deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan were impacted at energies of up to 518&nbsp;J, using a spring-assisted drop rig.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results showed that the Meindl Desert Fox combat boot consistently experienced a lower peak force at lower impact energies and a longer time-to-peak force at higher impact energies when compared with the Lowa Desert Fox combat boot.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This reduction in the peak force and extended rise time, resulting in a lower energy transfer rate, is a potentially positive mitigating effect in terms of the trauma experienced by the lower limb.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Currently, combat boots are tested under impact at the energies seen during heel strike in running. Through the identification of significantly different behaviours at high loading, this study has shown that there is rationale in adding the performance of combat boots under impact at energies above those set out in international standards to the list of criteria for the selection of a combat boot.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newell, N., Masouros, S. D., Pullen, A. D., Bull, A. M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2010.031344</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;ip.2010.031344</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The comparative behaviour of two combat boots under impact]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original article</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>112</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventing unintentional injuries to children under 15 years in the outdoors: a systematic review of the effectiveness of educational programs]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Unintentional injuries to children in the outdoors have a significant impact on child mortality, development and healthcare costs. This paper presents the findings of a systematic review about the effectiveness of programs that provided information, advice or education about the prevention of unintentional injuries to children under 15&nbsp;years during outdoor play and leisure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A structured search strategy was conducted in a range of databases. All report titles and abstracts were screened using pre-defined criteria. Included reports were quality appraised using a modified Graphical Appraisal Tool for Epidemiological studies (GATE) tool. All quality appraisals and data extraction were checked by a second reviewer. If not provided in the original reports, ORs and mean differences were calculated, where sufficient data were available.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. There was a paucity of robust study designs. The majority of studies only reported a short-term follow-up of intermediate outcome measures. Only two studies measured injury rates; both reported a reduction, but both studies also had considerable methodological weaknesses. The five studies that measured the use of protective equipment reported mixed results, although there is some evidence that suggests that more extensive educational programs (such as health fairs and media campaigns) increase their use. The 20 studies that measured behaviour, attitude or knowledge outcomes reported highly mixed results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Methodological weaknesses of the included studies limit support for a particular course of action. To better inform policy and practice, future research should (1) use robust study designs and (2) not rely on short-term proxy outcome measures.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pearson, M., Hunt, H., Garside, R., Moxham, T., Peters, J., Anderson, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040043</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040043</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Unlocked]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventing unintentional injuries to children under 15 years in the outdoors: a systematic review of the effectiveness of educational programs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>123</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Injury prevention and risk communication: a mental models approach]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Individuals' decisions and behaviour can play a critical role in determining both the probability and severity of injury. Behavioural decision research studies peoples' decision-making processes in terms comparable to scientific models of optimal choices, providing a basis for focusing interventions on the most critical opportunities to reduce risks. That research often seeks to identify the &lsquo;mental models&rsquo; that underlie individuals' interpretations of their circumstances and the outcomes of possible actions. In the context of injury prevention, a mental models approach would ask why people fail to see risks, do not make use of available protective interventions or misjudge the effectiveness of protective measures. If these misunderstandings can be reduced through context-appropriate risk communications, then their improved mental models may help people to engage more effectively in behaviours that they judge to be in their own best interest. If that proves impossible, then people may need specific instructions, not trusting to intuition or even paternalistic protection against situations that they cannot sufficiently control. The method entails working with domain specialists to elicit and create an expert model of the risk situation, interviewing lay people to elicit their comparable mental models, and developing and evaluating communication interventions designed to close the gaps between lay people and experts. This paper reviews the theory and method behind this research stream and uses examples to discuss how the approach can be used to develop scientifically validated context-sensitive injury risk communications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin, L. C., Fischhoff, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040079</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040079</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor's choice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Injury prevention and risk communication: a mental models approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Special feature</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>129</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/129?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conferences and events of interest]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/129?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Regional Safe Community Conferences 6th Asian Regional Conference on Safe Communities in 2012</st>
<p>11&ndash;13 May 2012, Tokyo, Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>The 3rd European Safe Community Conference The future role of the Fire and Rescue Service in the sustainability of Safe Communities in Europe</st>
<p>5 June 2012, Falk&ouml;ping, Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference</st>
<p>10&ndash;13 June 2012, Banff, Alberta.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Australasian Conference on Road Safety</st>
<p>9&ndash;10 August 2012, Sydney, Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>11th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion</st>
<p>1&ndash;4 October 2012, Wellington, New Zealand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine</st>
<p>14&ndash;17 October 2012, Seattle, Washington.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Canadian Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion Conference</st>
<p>6&ndash;9 November 2013, Montreal, Quebec.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pless, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040374</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2012-040374</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conferences and events of interest]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>129</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/130?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motor vehicle injuries in Qatar: time trends in a rapidly developing Middle Eastern nation]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/130?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Despite their wealth and modern road systems, traffic injury rates in Middle Eastern countries are generally higher than those in Western countries. The authors examined traffic injuries in Qatar during 2000&ndash;2010, a period of rapid population growth, focusing on the impact of speed control cameras installed in 2007 on overall injury rates and mortality. During the period 2000&ndash;2006, prior to camera installation, the mean (SD) vehicular injury death rate per 100 000 was 19.9&plusmn;4.1. From 2007 to 2010, the mean (SD) vehicular death rates were significantly lower: 14.7&plusmn;1.5 (p=0.028). Non-fatal severe injury rates also declined, but mild injury rates increased, perhaps because of increased traffic congestion and improved notification. It is possible that speed cameras decreased speeding enough to affect the death rate, without affecting overall injury rates. These data suggest that in a rapidly growing Middle Eastern country, photo enforcement (speed) cameras can be an important component of traffic control, but other measures will be required for maximum impact.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mamtani, R., Al-Thani, M. H., Al-Thani, A.-A. M., Sheikh, J. I., Lowenfels, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040147</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040147</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Unlocked]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motor vehicle injuries in Qatar: time trends in a rapidly developing Middle Eastern nation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/132?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/132?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hong-lin Chen, Kun Liu, Qin-Sheng You. Attention should be paid to preventing knee injury in tai chi exercise. <I>Inj Prev</I> 2011;<b>17</b>:286&ndash;287. doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040027. This article was published in print with the incorrect DOI. The correct DOI is 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-40027. This was the DOI published online first and therefore the DOI of record.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-40027</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-40027</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/133?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring child car passenger safety practices in China: experience from a parental survey in Shanghai]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/133?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Little is known about child passenger safety practice in China. This study aims to describe child passenger seating and restraint practice in Shanghai. Information on 970 children enrolled in five randomly selected kindergartens in the Songjiang and Pudong districts of Shanghai was collected from a parental survey during 2008&ndash;2009. The adjusted rate ratios for optimal (rear-seated alone) versus suboptimal seating position (including front-seated or sitting in adult laps) and restraint use versus non-use of restraints among child passengers were evaluated using multivariate binomial regression. Suboptimal seating position (16.9%) and non-use of restraints (60.8%) was common among child passengers. Younger age (&le;4 years) and having parents who are licensed drivers decreased the likelihood of being rear-seated alone; whereas having a tertiary-educated mother increased the likelihood of a child being seated optimally. Compared with unlicensed parents, guardian parents who have a driver's licence were more likely to use restraints for their child passengers. This study suggests restraint non-use and suboptimal seating position are common for child passengers in the Songjiang and Pudong districts of Shanghai, and identifies risk factors influencing restraint use and seating position choice for child passengers. There is an urgent need to improve child passenger safety in China and these findings indicate potential targets for educational interventions in the absence of child restraint laws.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pan, S., Du, W., Jiang, F., Bilston, L. E., Brown, J., Shen, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040049</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040049</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring child car passenger safety practices in China: experience from a parental survey in Shanghai]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Playground equipment injuries at home versus those in public settings: differences in severity]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The objective of the present research was to compare the severity of playground-related injuries in backyards of home with those occurring in public settings. This case&ndash;control study used emergency-based surveillance data from Canada regarding children, 3&ndash;11 years old, who were injured after falling from playground equipment (PGE). Cases were those whose injuries occurred at home (backyards), and controls were those whose injuries occurred in parks, schools or daycare centres. Of the 39 730 subjects selected, 84% happened in public and 16% at home. Children falling from a home PGE had greater odds of severe injuries (OR=1.30; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.37) and fractures (OR=1.47; 95% CI 1.39 to 1.55) than those from public PGE. Children aged 3&ndash;5 years falling off slides at home, compared to slides in public settings, had the greatest odds of severe injuries (OR=1.72; 95% CI 1.41 to 2.09) and fractures (OR=2.17; 95% CI 1.79 to 2.64.) When setting up PGE at home, parents should be diligent in using proper landing surfaces, such as those found in public playgrounds.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keays, G., Skinner, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040240</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2011-040240</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Playground equipment injuries at home versus those in public settings: differences in severity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Brief report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advancing understanding of racial and ethnic inequalities in injury research]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>In this column, we describe the need for those working in injury research and control to draw on important knowledge gained in recent years in the area of health inequalities/disparities if we are to alleviate racial and ethnic inequalities in injury.</p> <p>Health inequalities were once incorrectly believed to result from genetic and biological differences between race groups. As health research evolved and evidence of meaningful genetic or biological race differences failed to materialise, scholars began to identify socioeconomic status (SES) as the primary reason for health inequalities. This notion too was incorrect. Today it is widely recognised that social determinants (eg, poverty, education and environment) substantially contribute to health risks and outcomes.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> This is not a novel idea among injury researchers. However, the realisation of the impact of social determinants on health has begun to infiltrate the broader public health community. But what about research on race...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pollack, K. M., LaVeist, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040344</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2012-040344</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advancing understanding of racial and ethnic inequalities in injury research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>From SAVIR</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>144</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/146?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strengthening capacity for the prevention of family violence in low-income and middle-income countries]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/146?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The WHO, in collaboration with the Education Development Center, has developed two training packages covering child maltreatment and intimate partner and sexual violence to accompany its normative guidance on the prevention of family violence.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> The packages will help policymakers and programme planners improve their understanding of an evidence-based public health approach to preventing family violence and develop multisectoral policies and prevention programmes. They are also relevant to agencies that fund family violence prevention programmes. The target audience includes individuals working in sectors such as child protection, criminal justice, education, gender, health, social development and social welfare. The training packages have been field tested in over 10 countries in Asia, Africa, and Central and Latin America over the past year, and will be periodically revised to accommodate new research findings.</p> <p>Intimate partner and sexual violence and child maltreatment are major public health problems and violations...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kieselbach, B. S., Butchart, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040349</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2012-040349</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strengthening capacity for the prevention of family violence in low-income and middle-income countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>WHO update</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>146</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global news highlights]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/2/147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec><st>Shriners' annual burn prevention campaign misses the boat</st> <p>Burn Prevention Week in the USA was held last February and as they have done for many years, the Shriners lent their support. This is welcome but I was disappointed that the campaign is essentially educational. Two new characters, Boots and Brewster&mdash;a caped, cuddly bear and a googly-eyed teapot&mdash;teach children to be &lsquo;burn aware&rsquo; by taking them through a house, room by room, pointing out dangers, and how to avoid them. Entertaining no doubt, but effective? Based on the evidence, unlikely.</p> <p>Instead, I had hoped Shriners would use their great influence to combat efforts to have the fire-safe cigarette law repealed. Long ago, paediatrician Jack Crawford, recruited Liz McLoughlin to be part of his Shriners Burn Prevention Center in Boston. In 1978, McLoughlin joined Andrew McGuire's Trauma Foundation in San Francisco and after working to decrease sleepwear flammability they targeted preventing...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pless, I. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-22T16:43:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040360</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:injuryprev;injuryprev-2012-040360</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global news highlights]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>News and notes</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
