<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com">
<title>Injury Prevention current issue</title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com</link>
<description>Injury Prevention RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Jun  1 2009 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Injury Prevention</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1353-8047</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/e1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/145?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/150?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/170?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/188?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/208?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/214?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/215?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/216?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/homepage/IP_95x60.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/homepage/IP_95x60.gif">
<title>Injury Prevention</title>
<url>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/homepage/IP_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/e1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Study protocol] The Preventing Australian Football Injuries with Exercise (PAFIX) Study: a group randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/e1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Knee injuries are a major injury concern for Australian Football players and participants of many other sports worldwide. There is increasing evidence from laboratory and biomechanically focused studies about the likely benefit of targeted exercise programmes to prevent knee injuries. However, there have been few international studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of such programmes in the real-world context of community sport that have combined epidemiological, behavioural and biomechanical approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To implement a fully piloted and tested exercise training intervention to reduce the number of football-related knee injuries. In so doing, to evaluate the intervention&rsquo;s effectiveness in the real-world context of community football and to determine if the underlying neural and biomechanical training adaptations are associated with decreased risk of injury.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting:</st>
<p>Adult players from community-level Australian Football clubs in two Australian states over the 2007&ndash;08 playing seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A group-clustered randomised controlled trial with teams of players randomly allocated to either a coach-delivered targeted exercise programme or usual behaviour (control). Epidemiological component: field-based injury surveillance and monitoring of training/game exposures. Behavioural component: evaluation of player and coach attitudes, knowledge, behaviours and compliance, both before and after the intervention is implemented. Biomechanical component: biomechanical, game mobility and neuromuscular parameters assessed to determine the fundamental effect of training on these factors and injury risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures:</st>
<p>The rate and severity of injury in the intervention group compared with the control group. Changes, if any, in behavioural components. Process evaluation: coach delivery factors and likely sustainability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finch, C, Lloyd, D, Elliott, B]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Knee injuries, Recreation/Sports injury, Clinical trials (epidemiology)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.021279</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Study protocol] The Preventing Australian Football Injuries with Exercise (PAFIX) Study: a group randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>e1</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>e1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Study protocol</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Last chances]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnston, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Suicide (public health), Suicide/Self harm (injury)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2009.022814</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Last chances]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/146?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Injury surveillance: unrealistic expectations of safe communities]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/146?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Langley, J., Simpson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020974</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Commentary] Injury surveillance: unrealistic expectations of safe communities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>149</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/150?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Building national estimates of the burden of road traffic injuries in developing countries from all available data sources: Iran]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/150?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To use a range of existing information sources to develop a national snapshot of the burden of road traffic injuries in one developing country&mdash;Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>The distribution of deaths was estimated by using data from the national death registration system, hospital admissions and outpatient visits from a time-limited hospital registry in 12 of 30 provinces, and injuries that received no institutional care using the 2000 demographic and health survey. Results were extrapolated to national annual incidence of health burden differentiated by age, sex, external cause, nature of injuries and institutional care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>In 2005, 30 721 Iranians died annually in road traffic crashes and over one million were injured. The death rate (44 per 100 000) is the highest of any country in the world for which reliable estimates are available. Road traffic injuries are the third leading cause of death in Iran. While young adults are at high risk in non-fatal crashes, the elderly have the highest total death rates, largely due to pedestrian crashes. While car occupants lead the death count, motorised two-wheeler riders dominate hospital admissions, outpatient visits and health burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>Reliable estimates of the burden of road traffic injuries are an essential input for rational priority setting. Most low income countries are unlikely to have national injury surveillance systems for several decades. Thus national estimates of the burden of injuries should be built by collating information from all existing information sources by appropriately correcting for source specific shortcomings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhalla, K, Naghavi, M, Shahraz, S, Bartels, D, Murray, C J L]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020826</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Building national estimates of the burden of road traffic injuries in developing countries from all available data sources: Iran]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>150</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] The burden of road traffic injuries in Nigeria: results of a population-based survey]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Mortality from road traffic injuries in sub-Saharan Africa is among the highest in the world, yet data from the region are sparse. To date, no multi-site population-based survey on road traffic injuries has been reported from Nigeria, the most populated country in Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To explore the epidemiology of road traffic injury in Nigeria and provide data on the populations affected and risk factors for road traffic injury.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design:</st>
<p>Data from a population-based survey using two-stage stratified cluster sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Subjects/setting:</st>
<p>Road traffic injury status and demographic information were collected on 3082 respondents living in 553 households in seven of Nigeria&rsquo;s 37 states.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures:</st>
<p>Incidence rates were estimated with confidence intervals based on a Poisson distribution; Poisson regression analysis was used to calculate relative risks for associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>The overall road traffic injury rate was 41 per 1000 population (95% CI 34 to 49), and mortality from road traffic injuries was 1.6 per 1000 population (95% CI 0.5 to 3.8). Motorcycle crashes accounted for 54% of all road traffic injuries. The road traffic injury rates found for rural and urban respondents were not significantly different. Increased risk of injury was associated with male gender among those aged 18&ndash;44 years, with a relative risk of 2.96 when compared with women in the same age range (95% CI 1.72 to 5.09, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>The road traffic injury rates found in this survey highlight a neglected public health problem in Nigeria. Simple extrapolations from this survey suggest that over 4 million people may be injured and as many as 200 000 potentially killed as the result of road traffic crashes annually in Nigeria. Appropriate interventions in both the health and transport sectors are needed to address this significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labinjo, M, Juillard, C, Kobusingye, O C, Hyder, A A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020255</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] The burden of road traffic injuries in Nigeria: results of a population-based survey]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>162</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Neighbourhood income gradients in hospitalisations due to motor vehicle traffic incidents among Canadian children]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To investigate income gradients in motor vehicle traffic injury hospitalisation for vehicle occupants and pedestrians/cyclists among children in urban and rural Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design:</st>
<p>Four years (2001/02&ndash;2004/05) of acute-care hospitalisation discharge records for children aged 0&ndash;19 years were analysed. International Classification of Disease codes were used to determine hospitalisations due to motor vehicle traffic incidents for occupants and pedestrians/cyclists. Rates of injury (per 10 000 person years) were calculated by neighbourhood income quintiles for urban and rural areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Among children (0&ndash;19 years), rates of vehicle occupant hospitalisation were higher in rural (5.07, 95% CI 4.90 to 5.25) than urban areas (2.08, 95% CI 2.03 to 2.14). In rural areas, children from lower income neighbourhoods had higher vehicle occupant hospitalisation rates than those from the richest neighbourhoods (5.52, 95% CI 5.13 to 5.93 vs 4.30, 95% CI 3.97 to 4.66). In urban areas vehicle occupant hospitalisation rates were similar among children from the poorest and richest neighbourhoods&mdash;but higher among children from middle income neighbourhoods. In urban areas, but not rural areas, the hospitalisation rate for pedestrians/cyclists systematically increased with decreasing neighbourhood income. In urban areas the pedestrian/cyclist hospitalisation rate was four times higher for children from the poorest (1.40, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.57) than from the richest (0.34, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.43) neighbourhoods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>While vehicle occupant and pedestrian/cyclist motor vehicle traffic injuries are more frequent among children from lower income neighbourhoods, gradients are most pronounced for pedestrians/cyclists in urban areas.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver, L, Kohen, D]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020347</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Neighbourhood income gradients in hospitalisations due to motor vehicle traffic incidents among Canadian children]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>169</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/170?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Population-based estimates of injuries in Sri Lanka]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/170?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Injuries are the leading cause of public hospital admission in Sri Lanka. Data on injury epidemiology to plan prevention programmes to reduce injury burden are not readily available.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives:</st>
<p>To assess the incidence of various types of injuries in the Galle district, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>9568 individuals of all ages were selected from 2000 households in a population-based cross-sectional survey using a stratified cluster sampling technique. Data on non-fatal injuries in the last 30 days irrespective of severity, fatal injuries and those that resulted in disability in the last 12 months were documented. Proxy data were used for half of the injury cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>195 (2%) individuals reported non-fatal injuries during the last 30 days, giving an age-sex-urban-rural adjusted annual incidence of 24.6 per 100 population. The leading causes of non-fatal injuries were falls (adjusted annual incidence 6.7 per 100 population, 95% CI 6.0 to 7.3) and mechanical injuries (6.3; 95% CI 5.7 to 6.8), followed by road traffic injuries (4.9; 95% CI 4.4 to 5.5). 114 (58.5%) individuals needed outpatient care and 50 (25.6%) needed inpatient care for their injuries. The annual injury mortality rate and disability rate were 177 (95% CI 72 to 283) and 290 (95% CI 250 to 330) per 100 000 population, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>Nearly one in four people reported non-fatal injury; the majority sought medical attention in this population. It is important to utilise injury epidemiology to develop and implement interventions to reduce the burden of injuries in the population and on the hospitals in Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Navaratne, K V, Fonseka, P, Rajapakshe, L, Somatunga, L, Ameratunga, S, Ivers, R, Dandona, R]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.019943</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Population-based estimates of injuries in Sri Lanka]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Occupational eye injury and risk reduction: Kentucky workers' compensation claim analysis 1994-2003]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Occupational eye injuries are a significant source of injury in the workplace. Little population-based research in the area has been conducted, and is necessary for developing and prioritising effective interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Workers&rsquo; compensation data from the state of Kentucky for the years 1994&ndash;2003 were analysed by demographics, injury nature and cause, cost, and occupational and industrial characteristics. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics&rsquo; Current Population Survey was utilised to compute injury rates for demographic and occupational groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>There were 10 545 claims of ocular injury, representing 6.29 claims per 10 000 workers on average annually. A substantial drop in the claim rate was found after the state passed monetary penalties for injuries caused by employer negligence or OSHA violations. Claims by men were over three times more likely than those by women to have associated claim costs (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.85; p = 0.009). The highest eye injury rates per 10 000 of 13.46 (95% CI 12.86 to 14.07) were found for the helpers/labourers occupation, and of 19.95 (95% CI 18.73 to 21.17) for the construction industry. The total cost of claim payments over the period was over $3 480 000, and average cost per claim approximated $331.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>Eye injuries remain a significant risk to worker health, especially among men in jobs requiring intensive manual labour. Evidence showed that increased legislative regulation led to a decline in eye injuries, which was consistent with other recent findings in the area. Additionally, targeting groups most at risk, increasing worker training, providing effective eye protection equipment, and developing workplace safety cultures may together reduce occupational eye injuries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCall, B P, Horwitz, I B, Taylor, O A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Occupational eye injury and risk reduction: Kentucky workers' compensation claim analysis 1994-2003]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>182</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Recent psychopathology, suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts in households with and without firearms: findings from the National Comorbidity Study Replication]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To assess the relationship between firearm ownership and possible psychiatric confounders of the firearm&ndash;suicide relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between living in a home with firearms and 12-month occurrence of major <I>Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders</I> (DSM)-IV disorders and suicidal behaviour among respondents to the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a household survey of 9282 adults aged 18+. Analyses controlled for sociodemographic characteristics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment and poverty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Approximately one in three Americans reported living in a home with firearms. People living in a home with firearms were no more or less likely than people in homes without firearms to have recent (past year) anxiety disorders (OR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.2), mood disorders (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.1) or substance dependence and/or abuse (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.3). Past year suicidal ideation (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.3) and suicide planning (OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.4) were also not associated with living in households with firearms. Having made a suicide attempt over the previous year was the only outcome more common among participants reporting that they currently lived in a home with firearms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>The previously reported association between household firearm ownership and heightened risk of suicide is not explained by a higher risk of psychopathology among gun-owning families. As there are Americans with suicidal ideation and/or significant and recent psychiatric disorders currently living in homes with firearms, future work should focus on understanding the impediments to effectively communicating the suicide risk associated with household firearms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, M, Barber, C, Azrael, D, Hemenway, D, Molnar, B E]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Suicide (public health), Suicide/Self harm (injury)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.021352</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Recent psychopathology, suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts in households with and without firearms: findings from the National Comorbidity Study Replication]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/188?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Methodologic issues] Causes of injuries resulting in hospitalisation in Australia: assessing coder agreement on external causes]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/188?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To assess extent of coder agreement for external causes of injury using ICD-10-AM for injury-related hospitalisations in Australian public hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A random sample of 4850 discharges from 2002 to 2004 was obtained from a stratified random sample of 50 hospitals across four states in Australia. On-site medical record reviews were conducted and external cause codes were assigned blinded to the original coded data. Code agreement levels were grouped into the following agreement categories: block level, 3-character level, 4-character level, 5th-character level, and complete code level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>At a broad block level, code agreement was found in over 90% of cases for most mechanisms (eg, transport, fall). Percentage disagreement was 26.0% at the 3-character level; agreement for the complete external cause code was 67.6%. For activity codes, the percentage of disagreement at the 3-character level was 7.3% and agreement for the complete activity code was 68.0%. For place of occurrence codes, the percentage of disagreement at the 4-character level was 22.0%; agreement for the complete place code was 75.4%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>With 68% agreement for complete codes and 74% agreement for 3-character codes, as well as variability in agreement levels across different code blocks, place and activity codes, researchers need to be aware of the reliability of their specific data of interest when they wish to undertake trend analyses or case selection for specific causes of interest.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKenzie, K, Enraght-Moony, E L, Waller, G, Walker, S M, Harrison, J E, McClure, R J]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020479</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Methodologic issues] Causes of injuries resulting in hospitalisation in Australia: assessing coder agreement on external causes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>196</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Methodologic issues</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Systematic reviews] The effect of education and home safety equipment on childhood thermal injury prevention: meta-analysis and meta-regression]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To evaluate whether home safety education and safety equipment provision increases thermal injury prevention practices or reduces thermal injury rates and whether the effect of interventions differs by social group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD) evaluating home safety education with or without provision of free or discounted safety equipment provided to children or young people aged 0&ndash;19 years. Main outcome measures: possession of functional smoke alarm, fitted fireguard and fire extinguisher; keeping hot drinks or food and keeping matches or lighters out of reach; having a safe hot water temperature and rate of medically attended thermal injuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results:</st>
<p>Home safety interventions were effective in increasing the proportion of families with a functional smoke alarm (odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.74) and with a safe hot tap water temperature (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.80). There was some evidence they increased possession of fitted fireguards (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.94), but there was a lack of evidence that interventions reduced medically attended thermal injury rates (incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.12, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.56). There was no consistent evidence that the effectiveness of interventions varied by social group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>
<p>Home safety education, especially with the provision of safety equipment, is effective in increasing some thermal injury prevention practices, but there is insufficient evidence to show whether this also reduces injury rates.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kendrick, D, Smith, S, Sutton, A J, Mulvaney, C, Watson, M, Coupland, C, Mason-Jones, A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020677</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Systematic reviews] The effect of education and home safety equipment on childhood thermal injury prevention: meta-analysis and meta-regression]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Systematic reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Brief report] Mechanisms involved in the recent large reductions in US road fatalities]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Road fatalities in the USA have recently decreased, and these reductions are greater than the corresponding reductions in the amount of driving. A multiple regression analysis was performed on monthly data from January 2007 through December 2008. The dependent variable was the number of road fatalities. The independent variables were distance driven, proportion of driving on rural roads, and the average price of unleaded gasoline as a proxy for the proportion of leisure driving. The results suggest that the larger-than-expected fall in road fatalities is partly a consequence of the disproportional decreases in rural driving (which is more risky than urban driving) and leisure driving (which is more risky than commuter driving).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sivak, M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2009.021964</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Brief report] Mechanisms involved in the recent large reductions in US road fatalities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Study protocol] The Preventing Australian Football Injuries with Exercise (PAFIX) Study: a group randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background:</st>
<p>Knee injuries are a major injury concern for Australian Football players and participants of many other sports worldwide. There is increasing evidence from laboratory and biomechanically focused studies about the likely benefit of targeted exercise programmes to prevent knee injuries. However, there have been few international studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of such programmes in the real-world context of community sport that have combined epidemiological, behavioural and biomechanical approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective:</st>
<p>To implement a fully piloted and tested exercise training intervention to reduce the number of football-related knee injuries. In so doing, to evaluate the intervention&rsquo;s effectiveness in the real-world context of community football and to determine if the underlying neural and biomechanical training adaptations are associated with decreased risk of injury.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting:</st>
<p>Adult players from community-level Australian Football clubs in two Australian states over the 2007&ndash;08 playing seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods:</st>
<p>A group-clustered randomised controlled trial with teams of players randomly allocated to either a coach-delivered targeted exercise programme or usual behaviour (control). Epidemiological component: field-based injury surveillance and monitoring of training/game exposures. Behavioural component: evaluation of player and coach attitudes, knowledge, behaviours and compliance, both before and after the intervention is implemented. Biomechanical component: biomechanical, game mobility and neuromuscular parameters assessed to determine the fundamental effect of training on these factors and injury risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures:</st>
<p>The rate and severity of injury in the intervention group compared with the control group. Changes, if any, in behavioural components. Process evaluation: coach delivery factors and likely sustainability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finch, C, Lloyd, D, Elliott, B]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Knee injuries, Recreation/Sports injury, Clinical trials (epidemiology)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Study protocol] The Preventing Australian Football Injuries with Exercise (PAFIX) Study: a group randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>207</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Study protocol</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/208?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Policy forum] Working in the legislature: perspectives on injury prevention in the United States]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/208?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pollack, K M, Frattaroli, S, Morhaim, D]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2008.020388</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Policy forum] Working in the legislature: perspectives on injury prevention in the United States]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Policy forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[From SAVIR] Child injury around the world: a global research agenda for child injury prevention]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ebel, B. E, Medina, M. H., Rahman, A K M F., Appiah, N. J., Rivara, F. P]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2009.022475</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[From SAVIR] Child injury around the world: a global research agenda for child injury prevention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>212</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From SAVIR</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Cochrane corner] Update of a systematic review of vitamin D for preventing osteoporotic fractures]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Handoll, H]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Fractures]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2009.021576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Cochrane corner] Update of a systematic review of vitamin D for preventing osteoporotic fractures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>213</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cochrane corner</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/214?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[News and notes] News and notes]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/214?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/ip.2009.022327</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[News and notes] News and notes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>214</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>News and notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/215?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[PostScript] CALENDAR]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/215?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[PostScript] CALENDAR]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Splinters and fragments] Splinters and fragments]]></title>
<link>http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/15/3/216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-03</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Splinters and fragments] Splinters and fragments]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Splinters and fragments</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>