Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Behaviour, the Key Factor for Sports Injury Prevention

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Safety in sports and physical activity is an important prerequisite for continuing participation in sports, as well as for maintenance of a healthy physically active lifestyle. For this reason, prevention, reduction and control of sports injuries are important goals for society as a whole. Recent advances in sports medicine discuss the need for research on real-life injury prevention. Such views call for a more behavioural approach when it comes to actual sports injury prevention. Nevertheless, the role of behaviour in sports injury prevention remains under-researched. In order to push the field of sports injury prevention forward, this article provides an overview of the relationship between behaviour and sports injury risk.

Different types of behaviour relate to injury risk factors and injury mechanisms. Behaviour that influences risk factors and injury mechanisms is not confined only to the athlete. Various types of behaviour by, for example, the coach, referee, physical therapist or sports associations, also influence risk factors and injury mechanisms. In addition, multiple behaviours often act together. Some types of behaviour may directly affect injury risk and are by definition a risk factor. Other behaviours may only affect risk factors and injury mechanisms, and influence injury risk indirectly.

Recent ideas on injury prevention that call for studies on real-life injury prevention still rely heavily on preventive measures that are established through efficacy research.A serious limitation in such an approach is that one expects that proven preventive measures will be adopted if the determinants and influences of sports safety behaviours are understood. Therefore, if one truly wants to prevent sports injuries in a real-life situation, a broader research focus is needed. In trying to do so, we need to look at lessons learned from other fields of injury prevention research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HC. Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries: a review of concepts. Sports Med 1992; 14: 82–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meeuwisse W. Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model. Clin J Sport Med 1994; 4: 166–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sports. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 324–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meeuwisse WH, Tyreman H, Hagel B, et al. A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature ofrisk and causation. Clin J Sport Med 2007; 17: 215–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Finch C. A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Timpka T, Ekstrand J, Svnastrom L. From sports injury prevention to safety promotion in sports. Sports Med 2006; 36: 733–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McIntosh A. Risk compensation, motivation, injuries, and biomechanics in competitive sport. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 2–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Tiggelen D, Wickes S, Stevens V, et al. Effective prevention of sports injuries: a model integrating efficacy, efficiency,compliance and risk taking behaviour. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 648–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McGlashan AJ, Finch CF. The extent to which behavioural models are used in sport injury prevention research. Sports Med 2010; 40 (10): 841–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang J, Bowling JM, Lewis MA, et al. Use of discretionary protective equipment in high school athletes: prevalenceand determinants. Am J Public Health 2005; 95 (11): 1996–2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eime R, Owen N, Finch CF. Protective eyewear promotion: applying principles of behaviour change in the design of asquash injury prevention programme. Sports Med 2004; 34 (10): 629–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simpson J, Chalmers D, Waller A. The New Zealand Rugby Injury and Performance Project: developing ‘Tackling Rugby Injury’, a national injury prevention program. Health Promot J Aust 2002; 13 (1): 44–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deroche T, Stephan Y, Castanier C. Social cognitive determinants of the intention to wear safety gear among adultin-line skaters. Accid Anal Prev 2009; 41: 1064–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andersen PA, Buller DB, Scott MD, et al. Prevalence and diffusion of helmet use at ski areas in Western North America in 2001-02. Inj Prev 2004; 10: 358–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Nooijer J, de Wit M, Steenhuis I. Why young Dutch inline skaters do (not) use protection equipment. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14: 178–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams-Avery R, MacKinnon DP. Injuries and use of protective equipment among college in-line skaters. Accid Anal Prev 1996; 28 (6): 779–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen JC, Johnson RJ, Lefebvre MF, et al. Behavioral determinants of skiers’ failure to adjust release bindings. Clin Sports Med 1982; 1 (2): 209–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Iversen MD, Friden C. Pilot study of female high school basketball players’ anterior cruciate ligament injury knowledge,attitudes, and practices. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2009; 19 (4): 595–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Finch C, Donohue S, Donohue S. Safety attitudes and beliefsof junior Australian football players. Inj Prev 2002; 8: 151–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sawyer RJ, Hamdallah M, White D, et al. High school coaches’ assessments, intentions to use, and use of a concussionprevention toolkit: Centres for Disease Controland Prevention’s heads up, concussion in high schoolsports. Health Promo Prac 2010; 11 (1): 34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenstock I. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Quart 1974; 2: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1991; 50: 179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers RW. A protection motivation theory of fear appeal and attitude change. J Psychol 1975; 91: 93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychol Monogr 1966; 80 (1): 1–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lajunen T, Räsänen M. Can social psychological models be used to promote bicycle helmet use among teenagers? Acomparison of the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior and the Locus of Control. J Safety Res 2004; 5: 115–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Christakou A, Lavallee D. Rehabilitation from sports injuries: from theory to practice. Perspect Public Heal 2009; 129: 120–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: a selfreport index of habit strength. J Appl Psychol 2003; 33 (6): 1313–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Verplanken B. Beyond frequency: habit as mental construct. Brit J Soc Pscyhol 2006; 45: 639–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wood W, Tam L, Guerrero Wit M. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005; 88: 918–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Veplanken B. Habits and implementation intentions. In: Kerr J, Weitkunat R, Moretti M, editors. The ABC of behavioral change. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2005: 99–109

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gissane C, White J, Kerr K, et al. An operational model to investigate contact sports injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1999–2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Collard DC, Chinapaw MJ, van Mechelen W, et al. Design of the iPlay study: systematic development of a physicalactivity injury prevention programme for primary schoolchildren. Sports Med 2009; 39 (11): 889–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chalmers DJ. Injury prevention in sport: not yet part of the game? Inj Prev 2002; 8: IV 22–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arnason A, Tenga A, Engebretsen L, et al. A prospective video-based analysis of injury situations in elite male football. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 1459–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dvorak J, Junge A, Grimm K, et al. Medical report from the 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany. Br J Sports Med 2007; 4: 578–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sherker S, Cassell E. Preventing in-line skating injuries: how effective are the countermeasures? Sports Med 1999; 28: 325–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Warda L, Harlos S, Klassen TP, et al. An observational study of protective equipment use among in-line skaters. Inj Prev 1998; 4: 198–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schuster M, Israeli A. Survey of injuries and protective gear worn by in-line skaters in public parks. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1999; 78: 7–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Osberg JS, Stiles SC. Safety behavior of in-line skaters. Inj Prev 2000; 6: 229–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jerosch J, Heidjann J, Thorwesten L, et al. Injury pattern and acceptance of passive and active injury prophylaxis forinline skating. Knee Surg Sport Tr A 1998; 6: 44–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Heitkamp HC, Horstmann T, Schalinski H. In-line skating: injuries and prevention. J Sports Med Phys Fit 2000; 40: 247–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beirness DJ, Foss RD, Desmond KJ. Use of protective equipment by in-line skaters: an observational study. Inj Prev 2001; 7: 51–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Verhagen EALM, Van der Beek AJ, Bouter LM, et al. A one season prospective cohort study of volleyball injuries. Br JSports Med 2004; 38: 477–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Freeman MA. Instability to the foot after injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1965; 47: 669–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Brand RL, Black HM, Cox JS. The natural history of inadequately treated ankle sprain. Am J Sports Med 1977; 5: 248–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: a prospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 267–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tropp H, Odenrick P. Postural control in single limb stance. J Orthop Res 1988; 6: 833–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bahr R, Lian O, Bahr IA. A twofold reduction in the incidence of acute ankle sprains in volleyball after the introductionof an injury prevention program: a prospectivecohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7: 172–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wedderkopp N, Kaltoft M, Lundgaard B, et al. Prevention of injuries in young female players in European teamhandball: a prospective intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1999; 9: 41–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Verhagen EA, van der Beek AJ, Twisk JWR, et al. The effect of a proprioceptive balance board training program for theprevention of ankle sprains: a prospective controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 1385–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Emery CA, Rose MS, McAllister JR, et al. A prevention strategy to reduce the incidence of injury in high schoolbasketball: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Clin JSport Med 2007; 17: 17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bouter LM. Spanningsbehoefte en ongevalsrisico bij sportbeoefening. Geneeskunde en Sport 1986; 19: 205–8

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hagel B, Meeuwisse W. Risk compensation: a “side effect” of sport injury prevention? Clin J Sport Med 2004; 14: 193–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Morrow P, McQuillen E, Eaton L, et al. Downhill ski fatalities: the Vermont experience. J Trauma 1988; 28: 95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tough SC, Butt JC. A review of fatal injuries associated with downhill skiing. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1993; 14: 12–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Torg JS, Truex R, Quedenfeld TC, et al. The national football head and neck injury registry: report and conclusions1978. JAMA 1979; 241: 1477–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. LaPrade RF, Burnett QM, Zarzour R, et al. The effect of the mandatory use of face masks on facial lacerations andhead and neck injuries in ice hockey: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 773–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Murray TM, Livingston LA. Hockey helmets, face masks, and injurious behavior. Pediatrics 1995; 95 (3): 419–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hood M. Shoulder pads. In: Hood M, editor. Preparation performance and patch up: guide to fitness training and injury prevention. Auckland: Reed Publishers, 1987: 25–6

    Google Scholar 

  60. Reynen PD, Clancy WG. Cervical spine injury, hockey helmets, and face masks. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 167–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Taimela S, Kujala UM, Osterman K. Intrinsic risk factors and athletic injuries. Sports Med 1990; 9 (4): 205–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. van Mechelen W, Twisk J, Molendijk A, et al. Subject-related risk factors for sports injuries: a 1-yr prospectivestudy in young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28 (9): 1171–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kelley MJ. Psychological risk factors and sports injuries. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1990; 30: 202–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kontos A. Perceived risk, risk taking, estimation of ability and injury among adolescent sport participants. J Pediatr Psychol 2004; 29: 447–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Glasgow R, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice?Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am JPublic Health 2003; 93 (8): 1261–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Gielen AC, Sleet DA, DiClemente RJ, editors. Injury and violence prevention: behavioral science theories, methods,and applications. San Francisco (CA): John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2006: 576

    Google Scholar 

  67. Robertson L. Injury epidemiology: research and control strategies. 3rd rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 264

    Google Scholar 

  68. Trifiletti LB, Gielen AC, Sleet DA, et al. Behavioral and social sciences theories and models: are they used in unintentionalinjury prevention research? Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 298–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Gielen AC, Girasek DC. Integrating perspectives on the prevention of unintentional injuries. In: Schneiderman N, Speers MA, Siva JM, et al., editors. Integrating behavioraland social sciences with public health. Washington, DC: Clin Psychol (New York), 2000: 203–30

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gielen AC, Sleet D. Application of behavioral-change theories and methods to injury prevention. Epidemiol Rev 2003; 25: 65–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Gielen AC. Health education and injury control: integrating approaches. Health Educ Q 1992; 19: 203–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Thompson NJ, Sleet D, Sacks JJ. Increasing the use of bicycle helmets: lessons from behavioral science. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 46: 191–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All of the authors contributed equally to this article. Evert Verhagen was involved in the conceptualization and writing of the first draft of the article. Maartje van Stralen and Willem van Mechelen were involved in further developing the idea and finalization of the article. All authors contributed to the final article by reading and correcting the draft versions. All authors declare that they have no competing interests. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evert A. L. M. Verhagen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verhagen, E.A.L.M., van Stralen, M.M. & van Mechelen, W. Behaviour, the Key Factor for Sports Injury Prevention. Sports Med 40, 899–906 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11536890-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11536890-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation