The public health approach to occupational injury research: From surveillance to prevention
Section snippets
The public health model
The public health model, historically applied to infectious and chronic illness and more recently to injury prevention, is the framework used by NIOSH for occupational injury prevention research. It requires a multi-disciplinary organizational approach to conducting research for prevention, including partnerships with practitioners, industry and labor in the public and private sectors. It has become clear over time that research results alone, even from the best designed and executed studies,
Partnerships
Looking at this overall model, it should be apparent that there are areas that simply cannot be effectively addressed without the participation of people and organizations outside NIOSH, outside government, and outside academia. We would be hard pressed to conduct meaningful surveillance and injury investigations without the participation of the companies involved, and the government agencies within these jurisdictions. Analytic epidemiology often requires the collaboration of industry and
Research to practice
The value of occupational injury research, of course, is putting the results into practice in the workplace. NIOSH is emphasizing this with a new “research-to-practice” or r2p initiative to facilitate the transfer of scientific findings to prevention practice in the workplace. Our research findings are used as support for guidance and regulatory activities; as content for development of information products and training materials; as data to inform policy making and strategic planning; and as
A global approach
There has been substantial progress in occupational injury research in the US in each stage of our research approach. But there are still many needs to address. And many of these needs are not unique to the US but are global needs and priorities for work injury research.
Efforts towards a global approach to prevention will need to begin with a global approach to surveillance. Surveillance is not only the first step in this approach; it is the key driver to efficient and effective research for
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to Herb Linn for his contributions to the conceptualization of this paper. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
References (2)
- et al.
Comparison of work-related fatal injuries in the United States, Australia and New Zealand: methods and overall findings
Injury Prevention
(2001) - NIOSH, 1998. Traumatic Occupational Injury Research Needs and Priorities, Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and...
Cited by (15)
Local Information System on Occupational Accidents: Subsidies for the Development of Public Policies on Occupational Health
2020, Studies in Systems, Decision and ControlChallenging behaviour in dementia care: A novel framework for translating knowledge to practice
2020, Cognitive Behaviour TherapistLocal surveillance of occupational accidents and diseases: A device to support workers’ health public services
2019, Advances in Intelligent Systems and ComputingMissed opportunities to prevent workplace injuries and fatalities
2017, New Solutions