American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Determining what works to prevent the problem: U.S. military evaluations and systematic reviews of injury prevention strategyPrevention of Physical Training–Related Injuries: Recommendations for the Military and Other Active Populations Based on Expedited Systematic Reviews
Introduction
In 2003 the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) directed that rates of accidents and injuries must be markedly reduced.1 In response to the SECDEF's instruction, the Defense Safety Oversight Council (DSOC) was formed to provide governance on Department of Defense (DoD)-wide efforts to reduce preventable injuries and mishaps. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness chairs the DSOC, who chartered nine task forces to develop recommendations for policies, programs, and other investments to reduce preventable injuries and accidents. The Military Training Task Force (MTTF) was chartered to support the SECDEF's accident and injury prevention directive with a focus on interventions that relate to all aspects of military training.
Injury is undisputedly the leading health and readiness threat to the armed forces. Injuries are the leading cause of service member hospitalizations and outpatient visits, many resulting in preventable discharges, and account for over 25 million limited duty days DoD-wide annually.2, 3, 4 Training-related injuries have been identified as the leading cause of clinic visits and have a substantial impact on the readiness of the force due to the amount of limited duty time they cause.5, 6 Most of the preventable acute and traumatic injuries sustained by military personnel are due to the cumulative effect of weight bearing physical training activities such as running, particularly for military basic trainees.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 A working group of civilian and military injury experts from the Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy and the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM) identified physical training as the largest and most severe health problem for the U.S. Army and the one with the greatest possibility for prevention success.17, 18
The Joint Services Physical Training Injury Prevention Working Group (JSPTIPWG, hereafter referred to as working group, except in the tables) was created under the Military Training Task Force in September 2004 to evaluate military physical training injury prevention programs, policies, and research for recommendations to reduce physical training–related injuries during and after initial military training within the four U.S. military services (army, navy, air force, and Marine Corps). An expedited systematic review process used by the working group served three primary purposes:
- 1
Establish the evidence base for making recommendations to prevent physical training–related injuries;
- 2
Prioritize the recommendations for prevention programs and policies; and
- 3
Substantiate the need for further research and evaluation of interventions and programs likely to reduce physical training–related injuries.
Section snippets
Evidence Acquisition
A working group was formed which included 29 military and civilian researchers, public health practitioners, clinicians, training officers, epidemiologists, and analysts representing the four U.S. military services and injury experts from the CDC as well as professors at academic institutions. The working group initially met twice by teleconference and discussed a strategy for accessing previous subject matter expert panel recommendations, determined how to systematically review the scientific
Evidence Synthesis
There were 40 physical training–related injury prevention strategies identified by the working group. Three were determined to be critical components of a successful injury prevention program and not independent injury prevention strategies: (1) education of military leaders; (2) leadership support; and (3) unit injury surveillance. The working group agreed to categorize them as “essential elements” of an injury prevention program. During the process of the face-to-face meeting, the working
Discussion
As the essential elements of an injury prevention program were not considered independent injury prevention strategies, they were not reviewed with the same scrutiny as the other strategies. The following discusses the rationale for selecting these four components as essential elements of an injury prevention program.
Conclusion
An expedited systematic process of evaluating common strategies enabled the Joint Physical Training Injury Prevention Working Group to build consensus around those injury prevention interventions that had good scientific evidence to recommend to all military services. The systematic, criteria-based process and adaptation of guidelines that required a standardized level of scientific evidence before making any recommendation was central to the formulation of evidence-based recommendations and
References (328)
- et al.
Overuse injuries
Clin Sports Med
(1985) Stress fractures of the foot and ankle
Clin Podiatr Med Surg
(2001)- et al.
Running injuries about the knee
Clin Podiatr Med Surg
(2001) Overuse injuriesThe concept in 1992
Prim Care
(1991)Diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal running injuries
Semin Arthritis Rheum
(1988)- et al.
Injury prevention during physical activity in the Australian Defence Force
J Sci Med Sport
(2004) MemorandumOffice of the Secretary of Defense. Reducing Preventable Accidents
(19 May 2003)Atlas of injuries in the United States Armed Forces
Mil Med
(1999)- et al.
Physical training and exercise-related injuriesSurveillance, research and injury prevention in military populations
Sports Med
(1999) - et al.
Injuries in the military: a review and commentary focused on prevention
Am J Prev Med
(2000)
Military training-related injuries: surveillance, research, and prevention
Am J Prev Med
DoD Military Injury Prevention Priorities Working Group: leading injuries, causes, and mitigation recommendations
Influence of an injury reduction program on injury and fitness outcomes among soldiers
Inj Prev
Risk factors for injuries during military parachuting
Aviat Space Environ Med
Evaluation of two Army fitness programs: the TRADOC standardized physical training program for basic combat training and the fitness assessment program
Injury and fitness outcomes during implementation of physical readiness training
Int J Sports Med
Stress fractures in the lower extremities of soldiers in basic training
Orthop Rev
Prevention of pelvic stress fractures in female army recruits
Mil Med
Evaluation of a progressive unit-based running program during advanced individual training
Injuries in Australian Army recruitsPart II: location and cause of injuries seen in recruits
Mil Med
Injuries in Australian Army recruitsPart I: decreased incidence and severity of injury seen with reduced running distance
Mil Med
The effect of a modified physical training program in reducing injury and medical discharge rates in Australian Army recruits
Mil Med
Focusing injury prevention efforts: using criteria to set objective priorities
A model process for setting military injury prevention priorities and making evidence-based recommendations for interventions: a white paper for the Defense Safety Oversight Council, Military Training Task Force
A physical training program to reduce musculoskeletal injuries in U.S. Marine Corps recruits
Physical training program guidelines for U.S. Navy recruits: preparing recruits for battle stations
Prevention of injuries of sailors during accession training
Prevention of injuries to soldiers during initial entry training
A users' conference to prioritize injury prevention efforts
Exercise-related injuries among women: strategies for prevention from civilian and military studies
MMWR Recomm Rep
MemorandumOffice of the Surgeon General, U.S. Army. Army Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention Program (MIPP) for Initial Entry Training (IET)
The future of public health
A dictionary of epidemiology
The prevention of ankle sprains in sportsA systematic review of the literature
Am J Sports Med
U.S. Preventative Services Task Force Ratings: strength of recommendations and quality of evidenceGuide to Clinical Preventive Services, third edition: periodic updates 2000–2003
Prevention of soccer injuriesSupervision by doctor and physiotherapist
Am J Sports Med
Injury prevention in the U.S. Army, a key component of transformation
DoD Military Injury Metrics Working Group white paper
Field Manual 21–20Physical training
Risk factors for stress fractures
Sports Med
A survey of running injuries in 1505 competitive and recreational runners
J Sports Med Phys Fitness
Patterns and risk factors for exercise-related injuries in women: a military perspective
Mil Med
Injuries to runners: a study of entrants to a 10,000 meter race
Am J Sports Med
An epidemiologic study of the benefits and risks of running
JAMA
The natural history of exercise: a 10-yr follow-up of a cohort of runners
Med Sci Sports Exerc
Predicting lower-extremity injuries among habitual runners
Arch Intern Med
On the epidemiology of running injuriesThe 1984 Bern Grand-Prix study
Am J Sports Med
Frequency of training, and past injuries as risk factors for injuries in infantry soldiers
A fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle sprains in soccer players using the Sport-Stirrup orthosis
Am J Sports Med
Evaluation and management of common running injuries
Cleve Clin J Med
Cited by (147)
Evaluation of U.S. Army Soldiers wearing a back exosuit during a field training exercise
2023, Wearable TechnologiesAssociation of Dynamic Knee Valgus and Bone Stress Injury in US Military Academy Cadets
2023, Journal of Sport RehabilitationEfficacy of Army Combat Fitness Test 12-Week Virtual Exercise Program
2023, Military MedicinePhysical Demands of Air Force Special Operations Command Flight Crews: A Needs Analysis and Proposed Testing Protocol
2023, Strength and Conditioning Journal