ArticlesFirearms laws and the reduction of violence: A systematic review
Section snippets
Overview
The Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force) is conducting systematic reviews of scientific evidence about diverse interventions for the prevention of violence, and resulting injury and death, including, among others, early childhood home visitation,1, 2 therapeutic foster care,3 the transfer of juveniles to the adult justice system, school programs for the teaching of prosocial behavior, and community policing. This report presents findings about the effectiveness of
The Guide to Community Preventive Services
The systematic reviews in this report represent the work of the independent, nonfederal Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force). The Task Force is developing the Guide to Community Preventive Services (the Community Guide) with the support of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) in collaboration with public and private partners. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides staff support to the Task Force for development of the Community
Healthy People 2010 goals and objectives
This review provides information on the state of knowledge about firearms laws interventions related to the violence prevention objectives in Healthy People 2010,21 the disease prevention and health promotion agenda for the United States. These objectives identify some of the significant preventable threats to health and help focus the efforts of public health systems, policymakers, and law enforcement officials in their efforts to address those threats. Many of the proposed Healthy People
Conceptual approach and analytic framework
The general methods for conducting systematic reviews for the Community Guide have been described in detail elsewhere.22, 23, 24, 25 This section describes the conceptual approach, the selection of laws for review, review methods, and the determination of which outcomes to consider in assessing the effects of firearms laws on violence.
The logic model used by the review team to evaluate the effectiveness of firearms laws in reducing violence (Figure 2) depicts the flow of influences of firearms
Methods
In the Community Guide, evidence is summarized about (1) the effectiveness of interventions; (2) the applicability of findings (i.e., the extent to which available effectiveness data might apply to diverse populations and settings); (3) other positive or negative effects of the intervention, including positive or negative health and nonhealth outcomes; (4) economic impact; and (5) barriers to implementation of interventions. In the present review, in which sufficient evidence to determine the
Bans on specified firearms or ammunition
Bans on specified firearms and ammunition prohibit the acquisition and possession of certain categories of firearms (e.g., machine guns or assault weapons) or ammunition (e.g., large-capacity magazines or hollow-point bullets). They can also include prohibitions on the importation or manufacture of the specified firearms. Bans may be adopted at the federal, state, or local level, and may be combined with additional firearms regulations, such as requirements for safe storage, age restrictions on
Results: part II—research issues for firearms laws
Review of eight firearms laws and law types found insufficient evidence to determine whether the laws reviewed reduce (or increase) violence. Additional high-quality research is required to determine whether a relationship exists between firearms laws and violent outcomes. Areas for further potential study are discussed below.
Discussion: reviewing firearms law effects in the United States
International comparisons indicate that firearm-related violence is considerably higher in the United States than in other developed, industrialized nations.7 As with other public health problems, efforts have been made to reduce firearm-related violence by means of legal interventions. However, at least based on identified studies of the range of firearms laws reviewed here, the evidence is insufficient to determine whether U.S. firearms laws affect violence. When we conclude that evidence for
References (121)
- et al.
The effectiveness of early childhood home visitation in preventing violencea systematic review
Am J Prev Med
(2005) - et al.
Firearm violence among youthpublic health strategies for prevention
Ann Emerg Med
(1996) - et al.
Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services—methods
Am J Prev Med
(2000) - et al.
Developing the Guide to Community Preventive Services—overview and rationale
Am J Prev Med
(2000) - et al.
Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services
Am J Prev Med
(2000) - et al.
Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services
Am J Prev Med
(2000) Concealed-gun-carrying laws and violent crimeevidence from state panel data
Int Rev Law Econ
(1998)- et al.
First reports evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing violenceearly childhood home visitation
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
(2003) - et al.
The effectiveness of therapeutic foster care for the prevention of violencea systematic review
Am J Prev Med
(2005) - et al.
Deathsfinal data for 2001
Natl Vital Stat Rep
(2003)