Elsevier

Accident Analysis & Prevention

Volume 45, March 2012, Pages 683-693
Accident Analysis & Prevention

A prospective cohort study on minor accidents involving commuter cyclists in Belgium

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.045Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gain insight into bicycle accidents. Bicycle accident data and weekly exposure data were prospectively collected for one year to calculate the incidence rate (IR) of bicycle accidents. An accident was included if it occurred during utilitarian cycling, resulting in an acute injury with corporal damage. If an accident occurred, a detailed questionnaire was filled out to collect detailed information about its circumstances and consequences.

A sample of 1087 regular (≥2 cycling trips to work a week) adult (40 ± 10 years) cyclists was analyzed. Over the 1-year follow-up period, 20,107 weeks were covered, accumulating 1,474,978 cycled kilometers. Sixty-two participants were involved in 70 bicycle accidents, of which 68 were classified as ‘minor’. The overall IR for the 70 accidents was 0.324 per 1000 trips (95% CI 0.248–0.400), 0.896 per 1000 h (95% CI 0.686–1.106) and 0.047 per 1000 km (95% CI 0.036–0.059) of exposure. Brussels-capital region is the region with the highest IR (0.086; 95% CI 0.054–0.118), with a significantly (P < 0.05) higher IR compared to Flanders (0.037; 95% CI 0.025–0.050). Injuries were mainly caused by ‘slipping’ (35%) or ‘collision with a car’ (19%). The accidents caused abrasions (42%) and bruises (27%) to the lower (45%) and upper limbs (41%). Police, hospital emergency department or insurance companies were involved in only 7%, 10% and 30% of the cases, respectively. It is noteworthy that 37% of the participants indicated that they could have avoided the accident.

In order to decrease the number of accidents, measures should be taken to keep cycling surfaces clean and decrease the number of obstacles on bicycle infrastructure. Roads and intersections need to be built so that the collisions between cars and bicycles are decreased to a minimum. Car drivers and cyclists should pay more attention towards each other. Underreporting of minor bicycle accidents in Belgium is confirmed, and is higher than expected. Reliable accident statistics, taking into account exposure, are needed to decide which road safety measures are the most effective. The ‘safety in numbers’ principle is also applicable for minor bicycle accidents.

Highlights

► Incidence rate of bicycle accidents is 0.896 (95% CI 0.686–1.106) per 1000 h of exposure. ► Only 7% of prospectively recorded bicycle accidents were reported in police statistics. ► Exposure must be taken into account when statements about safety measures are made. ► The ‘safety in numbers’ principle is also applicable for minor bicycle accidents. ► ‘Slipping’ and ‘collision with a car’ are the most cited causes of accident.

Introduction

Cycling is recognized as an excellent way of being physically active and maintaining good health (Oja et al., 1998, Oja et al., 2011, Hendriksen et al., 2000, de Geus et al., 2008, de Geus et al., 2009). Furthermore, increased active transport (walking and cycling) could have a substantial role in meeting targets for urban air quality, greenhouse-gas emissions, and could result in major public-health benefits (Int Panis et al., 2004, Woodcock et al., 2007).

While cycling brings many personal, environmental and societal benefits, important barriers to cycling exist. These include fear of crime/vandalism, bad weather, social pressure, hills and slopes and long commuting distances (e.g. Pucher et al., 1999, Rietveld and Daniel, 2004, Gatersleben and Appleton, 2007, Parkin et al., 2008). Other important barrier to cycling are concerns about traffic safety, with women fearing accidents more than men (Vuori et al., 1994, Byrnes et al., 1999, Garrard et al., 2008, Tin Tin et al., 2010), lack of adequate infrastructure (Pucher et al., 1999, Parkin et al., 2007, Vandenbulcke et al., 2009) and exposure to air pollution (Int Panis et al., 2010, Jacobs et al., 2010). The balance between risks and benefits is a topic of ongoing debate (de Hartog et al., 2010, Int Panis, 2011).

The modern traffic system is primarily designed for motorized vehicles and often fails to make provision for other road users. Pedestrians and cyclists incur higher crash risks than motorists (in particular car drivers) in terms of accidents per distance covered (Pucher and Dijkstra, 2000, van Boggelen et al., 2005, BRSI, 2009, Elvik, 2009, Tin Tin et al., 2010). In Norway, the risk of injury, expressed as fatalities per kilometer while cycling is about 7.5 times higher than for car drivers (Pucher and Dijkstra, 2000, Elvik, 2009). In the Netherlands, for all age groups, about 5.5 times more fatal injuries are recorded per kilometer travelled by bicycle than by car (CBS, 2008). A study in Portland (US) (Hoffman et al., 2010) reported that nearly one in five bicycle commuters will experience an event leading to injury in any given year, regardless of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), or cycling skill level.

Most statistics on bicycle accidents result from retrospective surveys (Jacobson, 2003). A weakness of a retrospective study design is the selection and recall bias, resulting in the fact that especially the most serious injuries will be remembered or registered. It is well known that most road accident statistics strongly underestimate the total number of cycling accidents meaning that only the ‘tip of the iceberg’ is investigated (Dhillon et al., 2001, De Mol and Lammar, 2006, Hoffman et al., 2010), particularly when there is no hospitalization and the cyclist is the only party involved (Veisten et al., 2007, Vandenbulcke et al., 2009). A comparison of hospital admissions related to cycling accidents and police registrations of such accidents show that the latter register only 50% of the total number of cycling accidents in Europe (De Mol and Lammar, 2006) and only 10% in the US (Stutts et al., 1990, Pucher and Dijkstra, 2000). Several authors have estimated that in Belgium only about 15% of the cycling accidents are officially reported (Doom and Derweduwen, 2005, De Mol and Lammar, 2006, BRSI, 2006).

A shortcoming of the current literature and another weakness specific to retrospective study designs is that no precise recording of exposure data (bicycle usage, i.e. travel time, distance, frequency) is available nor is it possible to record such data precisely (Aultman-Hall and Hall, 1998). Yet the recording of exposure data is essential for the calculation of the incidence rate (IR). Data on the numerator (accidents) and denominator (exposure) recorded separately are inadequate to determine an IR, making comparisons between countries or regions within one country difficult (Jacobsen, 2003).

For the implementation of safety measures and the assessment of injury costs, a complete and accurate recording of minor and major accidents and the recording of the cycling exposure is essential. So far, only Aertsens et al. (2010) and Hoffman et al. (2010) have published results of a cohort study of minor bicycle accidents and detailed exposure data simultaneously.

The purpose of this study was therefore to record bicycle accidents, and to gain insight into exposure data during one year, using a prospective study design. The combination of accident and exposure data allows us to calculate the incidence rate of bicycle accidents.

Section snippets

Study design

This study is part of the SHAPES project (Systematic analysis of Health risks and physical Activity associated with cycling PoliciES) which is at the crossroads of health, transport and air pollution research. The aim of the SHAPES project is to analyze the benefits and risks (voluntary and involuntary) of cycling and to advise policy makers in order to facilitate the implementation of integrated policies related to cycling for transport. Within the SHAPES project exposure to traffic exhaust

Participants

After one year, 1849 persons left their e-mail address on the server (Table A, Appendix). Of these, 646 either did not open the first e-mail or did not meet the inclusion criteria. Only those (N = 1187; 68% men) who filled out more than one TD were retained for the data analyses presented in this paper. Thirty-six percent of those retained for the data analysis lived in the BCR, 49% in Flanders and 15% in Wallonia.

Descriptive data of the injured participants are reported in Table B (Appendix) and

Impact of minor bicycle accidents

In Belgium in 2008, 7132 accidents recorded by official police statistics were classified as “minor accidents” (hospitalization of less than 24 h) (NIS, 2009). Based on our data, we can extrapolate the incidence in our study to Belgium. Because only two accidents required hospitalization for more than 24 h, the following estimation is based on 68 accidents. As only 5.9% of the minor cycling accidents are officially reported, it is estimated that 120,881 victims would have suffered from minor

Study limitations

Some limitations of this study should be noted. Due to the nature of the study, well-skilled cyclists, who cycle a greater distance and time than occasional cyclists, are more likely to be captured in the data. The small number of observations may be the reason why the differences between genders or between the regions were not significant. Yet another limitation of this study is that the study population is self-selected.

Conclusion

In this study, a large cohort (N = 1187) of regular (≥2 cycling trips to work/week) commuter cyclists, aged 18–65 years was prospectively followed during a 1-year period, during which exposure and bicycle accidents were registered simultaneously. In total 62 cyclists experienced at least one injury. The registered accidents were classified as ‘minor’ bicycle accidents in 97% of the cases, resulting in abrasions and bruises of the upper and lower limbs. We have demonstrated that a prospective

Ethical issues

The Vrije Universiteit Brussel ethical committee approved the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests with respect to the results discussed in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This paper is part of the SHAPES project (Systematic analysis of Health risks and physical Activity associated with cycling PoliciES) which is at the crossroads of health, transport and air pollution research. The aim of the SHAPES project is to analyze the benefits and risks (voluntary and involuntary) of cycling and to advise policy makers in order to facilitate the implementation of integrated policies in different domains related to cycling for transport.

The work reported in this paper was

References (78)

  • L. Int Panis et al.

    An uncertainty analysis of air pollution externalities from road transport in Belgium in 2010

    Science of the Total Environment

    (2004)
  • L. Int Panis et al.

    Exposure to particulate matter in traffic: a comparison of cyclists and car passengers

    Atmospheric Environment

    (2010)
  • J.K. Kim et al.

    Bicyclist injury severities in bicycle–motor vehicle accidents

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (2007)
  • B.P.Y. Loo et al.

    Bicycle crash casualties in a highly motorized city

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (2010)
  • P. Oja et al.

    Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity

    Patient Education and Counseling

    (1998)
  • J. Parkin et al.

    Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (2007)
  • R.O. Phillips et al.

    Meta-analysis of the effect of road safety campaigns on accidents

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (2011)
  • J. Pucher et al.

    Bicycle renaissance in North America: recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling

    Transportation Research Part A

    (1999)
  • P. Rietveld et al.

    Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter?

    Transportation Research Part A

    (2004)
  • K.M. Rosenkranz et al.

    Trauma to adult bicyclists: a growing problem in the urban environment

    Injury: International Journal of the Care of the Injured

    (2003)
  • M. Stone et al.

    Getting off your bike: cycling accidents in Great Britain in 1990–1999

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (2003)
  • J.C. Stutts et al.

    Bicycle accidents and injuries: A pilot study comparing hospital- and police-reported data

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (1990)
  • G. Vandenbulcke et al.

    Mapping bicycle use and the risk of accidents for commuters who cycle to work in Belgium

    Transport Policy

    (2009)
  • G. Vandenbulcke et al.

    Cycle commuting in Belgium: spatial determinants and ‘re-cycling’ strategies

    Transportation Research Part A

    (2011)
  • K. Veisten et al.

    Total costs of bicycle injuries in Norway: correcting injury figures and indicating data needs

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (2007)
  • J. Woodcock et al.

    Energy and transport

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • J.H.M. Brooks et al.

    The influence of methodological issues on the results and conclusions from epidemiological studies of sports injuries

    Sports Medicine

    (2007)
  • Belgian Road Safety Institute (BRSI), 2006. Cycling accidents in an urban context: three years (1998–2000) of...
  • Belgian Road Safety Institute (BRSI), 2009. Observatorium voor de Verkeersveiligheid. Themarapport fietsers...
  • H.-Y. Berg

    Reducing crashes and injuries among young drivers: what kind of prevention should we be focusing on?

    Injury Prevention

    (2006)
  • J.P. Byrnes et al.

    Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1999)
  • CBS (Statistics Netherlands), 2008. Available:...
  • N. Christie et al.

    How exposure information can enhance our understanding of child traffic “death leagues”

    Injury Prevention

    (2007)
  • C. Cryer et al.

    Developing valid indicators of injury incidence for all injury

    Injury Prevention

    (2006)
  • E. Cumps et al.

    Efficacy of a sports specific balance training programme on the incidence of ankle sprains in basketball

    Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

    (2007)
  • L.A. Davidson

    Epidemiology and outcome of bicycle injuries presenting to an emergency department in the United Kingdom

    European Journal of Emergency Medicine

    (2005)
  • B. de Geus et al.

    Cycling to work: influence on indexes of health in untrained men and women in Flanders. Coronary heart disease and quality of life

    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

    (2008)
  • B. de Geus et al.

    Commuter cycling: effect on physical performance in untrained men and women in Flanders. Minimum dose to improve indexes of fitness

    Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

    (2009)
  • J.J. de Hartog et al.

    Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks?

    Environmental Health Perspectives

    (2010)
  • Cited by (122)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text