Original articlesAge-Period-Cohort Models: A Comparative Study of Available Methodologies
Section snippets
Age-period-cohort models and assumptions
Age-period-cohort models are routinely used in descriptive epidemiology to analyze trends in disease incidence and mortality [1]. They are used as a means of summarizing the information in a two-way table of disease rates classified by age group and time period, such as in Table 1. In this table, the birth cohorts form the diagonals with the oldest cohort at the bottom left-hand corner (individuals aged 80–84 in 1960–1964 were born in 1874–1884), and the youngest cohort at the top right-hand
Indentifiability solutions
There are three broad classes of solutions within the age-period-cohort models other than those that are based on arbitrary linear constraints [15]. The first is based on the use of a penalty function that is minimized to derive the necessary extra linear constraint. Second, there are the methods that rely on having individual records of cases so that a three-way age-period-cohort table can be constructed. Finally, there are the methods that concentrate solely on the estimable functions. A
Data generation methodology
The female population of Scotland over the period 1960 to 1989 for ages 30–84 in 5-year age groups and time periods was used as the basis of the calculation of the expected numbers of cases (Table 1). Two separate methods were used to generate the expected rates. The curvature approach [12] is mathematically correct and can be used to generate the data according to any predefined structure. Specifically, data with age effects similar to those obtained in many cancer sites were generated with
Results
The specified parameter estimates for the calculated data are listed in Table 3 for the two-way tables, based on model 1, and in Table 4 for the individual level approach based on model 2. Initially, simple models are used, and then more complex combinations of parameter values are specified to achieve tables that are representative of features that might be observed in practice. Results for a number of models based on a two-way table only are illustrated in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3. The
Conclusions
In the absence of drift and non linear period and cohort effects the method of Robertson and Boyle [19] gives biased estimates of the Age, Period and Cohort effects in the direction of increasing period effects and decreasing cohort effects and Age incidence curves which are not as steep. These effects are not as severe in the presence of some drift in the rates or some non linear period and cohort effects.
If there is a linear drift, then the Decarli and La Vecchia [18] approach is biased
References (25)
- et al.
Statistical age-period-cohort analysisA review and critique
J Chronic Dis
(1985) - et al.
Trends in Cancer Incidence and Mortality
(1993) Analysing the temporal effects of age, period and cohort
Stat Methods Med Res
(1992)The estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates
Biometrics
(1983)- Fienberg SE, Mason WM. Identification and estimation of age-period-cohort models in the analysis of discrete archival...
- et al.
Cancer risk following a community based programme to prevent cardiovascular diseases
Int J Epidemiol
(1995) - et al.
Incidence of perforated ulcer in western Norway, 1935–1990Cohort- or period-dependent time trends?
Am J Epidemiol
(1995) - et al.
Age-period-cohort analysis of breast cancer mortality
Anticancer Res
(1995) - et al.
Female mortality trends in Spain due to tumours associated with tobacco smoking
Cancer Causes Control
(1993) - et al.
Interactions between birth cohort and urbanisation on gastric cancer mortality in Taiwan
Int J Epidemiol
(1994)
A comparison of three methods of analysis for age-period-cohort models with application to incidence data on non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Int J Epidemiol
Models for temporal variation in cancer rates IIAge-period-cohort models
Stat Med
Cited by (120)
Trends in the disease burden of HBV and HCV infection in China from 1990-2019
2022, International Journal of Infectious DiseasesCitation Excerpt :Period effects refer to the change of incidence/mortality in different time periods due to many factors, such as different screening strategies, disease diagnosis technology, changes in disease definitions and registration, and improvement in treatment. Cohort effects cover the changes of incidence/mortality due to different levels of exposure to risk factors in different generations (Robertson et al., 1999). Our results suggest that the age and period effects on the HBV- and HCV-associated incidences and mortality were statistically significant, and the risk of incidence and mortality decreased over time.
Time trends and age-period-cohort effects on the incidence of the most frequent cancers in Oran, Algeria, 1999–2018
2021, Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante PubliqueEpidemiological trend of lung cancer burden caused by residential radon exposure in China from 1990 to 2019
2024, European Journal of Cancer Prevention