Paper
Trends in cycle injury in new zealand under voluntary helmet use

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(96)00054-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Twelve months before the wearing of a cycle helmet was to become mandatory in New Zealand, a substantial proportion of cyclists on public roads had ‘voluntarily’ adopted wearing a helmet. Helmet wearing rates had increased up to 84, 62 and 39% for primary school children, secondary school children, and adults respectively by the end of the period of interest. The purpose of this study was to examine the serious injury trends for three age groups of cyclists: primary school age (5–12 years), secondary school age (13–18 years), and adults (over 18 years) admitted to selected public hospitals between 1980 and 1992; twelve months before the introduction of helmet legislation. Serious injury was defined as ‘admitted to hospital’ then disaggregated by type of crash and length of stay. Statistical models were constructed that included the proportion of people admitted to hospital with a head injury, then analysed using Poisson regression. Results revealed that the increased helmet wearing percentages has had little association with serious head injuries to cyclists as a percentage of all serious injuries to cyclists for all three groups, with no apparent difference between bicycle only and all cycle crashes. Discussion of the results includes possible explanations for the absence of a decline in the percentage of serious head injury among cyclists as cycle helmet wearing has increased.

References (19)

  • T. Wood et al.

    Head injuries to pedal cyclists and the promotion of helmet use in Victoria, Australia

    Accident Analysis & Prevention

    (1988)
  • J. Annis et al.

    Final report bicycle helmets: finding a fit

  • P. Armitage et al.

    Statistical methods in medical research

    (1987)
  • M.H. Cameron et al.

    Mandatory bicycle helmet use following a decade of helmet promotion in Victoria Australia—an evaluation

    Accident Analysis & Prevention

    (1994)
  • B.A. Collins et al.

    Injuries to pedal cyclists resulting in death and hospitalisation

    New Zealand Medical Journal

    (1993)
  • C.F. Finch et al.

    Bicycle use and helmet wearing rates in Melbourne 1987–1992: the influence of the helmet wearing law

  • C.F. Finch et al.

    Head injury reductions in Victoria two years after introduction of mandatory bicycle helmet use

  • C. Illingworth

    The argument for helmets

    British Medical Journal

    (1992)
  • J.D. Langley

    Experiences using New Zealand's hospital based surveillance system for injury prevention research

    Methods Inform. Med.

    (1995)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (32)

  • An application of in-vehicle recording technologies to analyze injury severity in crashes between taxis and two-wheelers

    2022, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite these efforts, the results are strongly dependent on the availability and accuracy of crash data (Austin, 1995; Loo, 2006; Tarko et al., 2009; Chung and Chang, 2015). Some applied new data collected by new technologies, such as video recording devices (Sayed et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2019b), a combination of the existing data and other sources, such as a hospital-recorded data (Larsen and Hardt-Madsen, 1988; Weiss, 1992; Scuffham and Langley, 1997), and other methods, such as interview and survey of the crash-involved person (Langley et al., 2000; Lin et al., 2003; Bjørnskau et al., 2012). Of these, new technologies, such as video recording devices, have enabled the collection of crash information on all crash scenes from pre-crash to post-crash, crash speed, crash time, crash location (or trajectories), vehicle control status, and crash-involved vehicle maneuvers (Chung and Chang, 2015).

  • The effectiveness of helmets in bicycle collisions with motor vehicles: A case-control study

    2013, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    To date, there has been ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of cycling helmets in preventing head injuries (Curnow, 2003; Thompson et al., 1999; Walter et al., 2011). Prior studies that have examined this issue have been population-based cohorts (Povey et al., 1999; Scuffham and Langley, 1997; Scuffham et al., 2000; Tin Tin et al., 2010; Walter et al., 2011) and case–control studies (Amoros et al., 2012; Hansen et al., 2003; Heng et al., 2006; Maimaris et al., 1994; McDermott et al., 1993; Spaite et al., 1991; Thomas et al., 1994; Thompson et al., 1989, 1996). While the case–control studies have typically shown that helmets reduce the odds of head injury to some extent, they have had conflicting findings as to the magnitude of the reduction experienced.

  • Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City

    2013, Accident Analysis and Prevention
  • Bicyclist injury severities in bicycle-motor vehicle accidents

    2007, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Helmets are protective against head injury and brain injury (Depreitere et al., 2004; Robinson, 2001; Schieber and Sacks, 2001; Povey et al., 1999; Thompson et al., 1996; Wasserman et al., 1988). Although helmets are effective for all bicyclists, regardless of age, helmets are not always properly used, e.g. worn in a poor position on the head, so helmet design can possibly be improved to reduce improper use (Curnow, 2003; Scuffham and Langley, 1997; Robinson, 2001; Ching et al., 1997). Helmet usage is related with other factors: for example, helmet usage rates were in one study found related with the time spent riding a bicycle each year (Rodgers, 2000), another study found those who wear helmets are more highly educated (Wasserman et al., 1988), and yet another study found helmet use in rural areas to be lower than in urban areas across all age groups and for both genders (Harlos et al., 1999).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text