Infants and children in the adult world of automobile safety design: Pediatric and anatomical considerations for design of child restraints

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(69)90083-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The infant and child differ structurally from the adult in a number of ways which are critical to the design for protection against impact forces and for adequate occupant restraint systems. The purpose of this paper is to bring together a profile of the anatomy, anthropometry, growth, and development of the infant and child. Age differences related to the proper design of child restraint systems are emphasized. Problems discussed include child-adult structural differences, center of gravity of the body, the head mass in relation to the neck and general body proportions, positions of key organs, and biomechanical properties of tissues.

References (50)

  • J.S. Life et al.

    Response of the canine heart to thoracic impact during ventricular diastole and systole

    J. Biomechanics

    (1968)
  • I. Asami

    Study on the strength of human urinary organs

    J. Kyoto Pref. Univ. Med.

    (1961)
  • P. Blanton

    Tensile strength of fetal and adult human tendons

  • L.B. Chenoweth et al.

    School Health Problems

    (1937)
  • W.M. Crosby et al.

    Impact injuries in pregnancy — I. Experimental studies

    Am. J. Obstet. Gynec.

    (1968)
  • F.C. DiVincenti et al.

    Blunt abdominal trauma

    J. Trauma

    (1968)
  • F.G. Evans

    Stress and Strain in Bones

  • E.W. Fonkalsrud

    Acute trauma in infants and children

  • W.G. Frasher

    What is known about the physiology of large blood vessels

  • Y. Fukuyama

    Age changes of the strength for tension of human gastric walls

    J. Kyoto Pref. Univ. Med.

    (1961)
  • T. Fukuyama

    Studies on the strength for bursting the walls of human and animal oesophages

    J. Kyoto Pref. Univ. Med.

    (1961)
  • Y.C. Fung

    Biomechanics

    Appl. Mech. Rev.

    (1968)
  • G. Herrmann et al.

    Mechanics of bone fracture

  • C. Hirsch et al.

    Studies on some physical properties of infant compact bone

    Acta orthop. scand.

    (1965)
  • W.H. Johnson et al.

    Radiographic Anatomy of The Human Skeleton

    (1961)
  • K. Katake

    Studies on the strength of human skeletal muscles

    J. Kyoto Pref. Univ. Med.

    (1961)
  • J.K. Kihlberg et al.

    Head Injuries in Automobile Accidents Related to Seat, Position, and Age

    (1967)
  • R. Ko et al.

    The tension test upon the costal cartilage of a human body

    J. Kyoto Pref. Univ. Med.

    (1953)
  • H. Kraus

    On the mechanical properties and behavior of human compact bone

  • W.M. Krogman

    Height, weight and body growth of American white and American negro boys at Philadelphia, aged 6–14 yr

    (1960)
  • W.M. Krogman

    Growth of man

  • W.M. Krogman et al.

    The physical growth of Philadelphia white children, age 7–17 yr

    (1965)
  • S.A. Heap et al.

    The design and development of a more effective child restraint concept

  • I. Lasky et al.

    Automotive cardio-thoracic injuries: a medico-engineering analysis

  • W.E. Martin et al.

    The functional body measurements of school age children

  • Cited by (106)

    • Estimation of a statistical geometric model for the cervical vertebrae of children aged 10–18 years

      2021, Medical Engineering and Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Child neck injuries in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) result in high morbidity and mortality rates [1,2]. It is known that a child's neck is not simply a miniature version of an adult's neck [3]. Some anatomical structures of a child's cervical spine do not exist in an adult, or are undergoing noticeable changes.

    • Traditional and 3D scan extracted measurements of the heads and faces of Dutch children

      2019, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Firstly, the age composition within each age category could differ for each dataset which could influence the results. The dimensions of the face experience the most growth of the entire head, with rapid growth phases occurring mostly between the ages of 6 months and 4 years (Farkas et al., 1992; Burdi et al., 1969). As a result, having more children with an age between 12 and 18 months in age group 1 (that runs from 12 months to 24 months), for example, could result in smaller average values.

    • A coupled physical-computational methodology for the investigation of short fall related infant head impact injury

      2019, Forensic Science International
      Citation Excerpt :

      There was no variation in local impact acceleration response greater than 15%, that is, at the impact velocity of 1.72 m s−1, 11% at the vertex, 4% at the occiput, 6% at the frontal and 13% at the parietal regions and at the impact velocity of 2.43 m s−1by 12% (vertex), 3% (occiput), 5% frontal and 11% at the parietal region. As discussed above, this is unsurprising, since the mass of the infant skull bones is relatively small compared with to the overall mass of the head [28]. The bones are, therefore, likely to come to rest more quickly than the more massive structure of the brain.

    • Current playground surface test standards underestimate brain injury risk for children

      2019, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      All age groups of children from 0 to 18 YO are injured in playground accidents (Adelson et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2013) but a higher proportion of head and neck injuries are found among the youngest individuals (Adelson et al., 2018). The difference in anatomy between a young child compared to young adult is large, especially the head with softer skull bone with sutures as well as a higher ratio between head and body mass for the youngest children (Burdi et al., 1969). The usage of FE models of human body has increased during the last decades in the automotive industry as an important tool to evaluate and improve safety.

    • Effect of pediatric growth on cervical spine kinematics and deformations in automotive crashes

      2018, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The availability of studies on the biomechanics of the pediatric cervical spine is more limited. It is however well known that there are large proportional and structural differences between children and adults (Burdi et al., 1969). Among children, the head is proportionally significantly larger in relation to the rest of the body compared to adults and the neck also becomes more slender with age.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the ASME Third Biomechanical and Human Factors Division Conference at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, June 12–13, 1969.

    View full text