PaperThe public health impact of minor injury
References (11)
- et al.
A system for measuring the severity of temporary and permanent disability after injury
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(1991) Australian Demographic Statistics September quarter 1992
(1993)Deaths Australia
(1993)Australia's Health 1992
(1992)- et al.
Choosing criteria to screen for specific medical conditions from non specific sources: an application to injury surveillance
Am. J. Epidemiol.
(1992)
Cited by (51)
A review of the revised Functional Capacity Index as a predictor of 12 month outcomes following injury
2017, InjuryCitation Excerpt :Variability in outcome prediction between more and less severe injury is not unique to the pFCI [56], but remains an important limitation of this and other panel-derived tools. The considerable population morbidity arising from minor trauma has also been noted elsewhere [57,58]. The development, initial testing and preliminary validation of the original pFCI was sponsored and partly conducted by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [13–15,29,30,49].
Inclusion of 'minor' trauma cases provides a better estimate of the total burden of injury: Queensland Trauma Registry provides a unique perspective
2014, InjuryCitation Excerpt :Over a 6-year period (2005–2010), minor cases (ISS ≤ 12) accounted for almost 90% of all trauma included on the QTR. Previous analyses of Queensland and Western Australian data have reported similar percentages of minor injury cases [16,28]. Although these cases were classified as ‘minor trauma’ in terms of injury severity and threat to life, the injuries sustained were still serious enough to warrant admission to hospital for 24 h or more for acute treatment, and can include injuries such as fractures to multiple body regions, burns to up to 30% of the body, below-elbow and below-knee amputations, and penetrating injuries with up to 20% blood loss [20].
Standardising trauma monitoring: The development of a minimum dataset for trauma registries in Australia and New Zealand
2013, InjuryCitation Excerpt :There are problems with only focusing on major trauma, as a substantial proportion of the total population injury burden will be missed.32,33 This may have ramifications for the appropriateness of decisions related to funding for trauma care.33 Also, there remains some doubt as to the utility of outcomes data collected at the end of acute care in predicting long-term functional outcomes.6,10,34
Work disability after road traffic injury in a mixed population with and without hospitalisation
2013, Accident Analysis and PreventionOutcomes one year after a road accident: Results from the ESPARR cohort
2013, Accident Analysis and PreventionLonger term health of young and middle-aged adults following unintentional falls at home resulting in hospitalisation
2012, InjuryCitation Excerpt :Our findings are not representative of individuals with less severe forms of physical injury, who may (or may not) receive care in primary care or emergency department settings. Although these injuries may not pose a threat to life, they could pose significant risks of longer term disability.28 Whilst the pre-injury health status was ascertained after the injury, the risk of bias with respect to differential recall of health by those with and without longer term adverse outcomes was minimised by collecting baseline information as close to the initial event as was ethically possible.