Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones— A simulator study
Abstract
The effects of a mobile telephone task on drivers' reaction time, lane position, speed level, and workload were studied in two driving conditions (an easy or rather straight versus a hard or very curvy route). It was predicted that the mobile telephone task would have a negative effect on drivers' reaction time, lane position, and workload and lead to a reduction of speed. It was also predicted that the effects would be stronger for the hard driving task. The study was conducted in the VTI driving simulator. A total of 40 subjects, experienced drivers aged 23 to 61, were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions (telephone and easy or hard driving task versus control and easy or hard driving task). Contrary to the predictions, the strongest effects were found when the subjects were exposed to the easy driving task. In the condition where drivers had to perform the easy driving task, findings showed that a mobile telephone task had a negative effect on reaction time and led to a reduction of the speed level. In the condition where drivers had to perform the hard driving task, findings showed that a mobile telephone task had an effect only on the drivers' lateral position. Finally, the mobile telephone task led to an increased workload for both the easy and the hard driving task. The results are discussed in terms of which subtask, car driving or telephone task, the subjects gave the highest priority. Some implications for information systems in future cars are discussed.
References (10)
- A.D. Baddeley et al.
Components of fluent reading
Journal of Memory and Language
(1985) - I.D. Brown et al.
Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning
Journal of Applied Psychology
(1969) - CHP
Mobile telephone safety study
(1987) - B.T. Davies et al.
Preliminary investigation of movement time between brake and accelerator pedals in automobiles
Human Factors
(1969) - S.G. Hart et al.
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research
Cited by (201)
The effects of distraction on younger drivers: A neurophysiological perspective
2024, Applied ErgonomicsDistracted driving remains a significant cause of traffic accidents globally, including in Australia. However, many younger drivers still admit to using a phone while driving. A simulated driving study investigated the neurophysiological effects of visual, auditory, and higher-order cognitive (i.e., requiring the use of executive functions) distraction on young drivers. In total, 24 young adults aged 18–25 years completed four 8 min simulated driving sessions while concurrently engaging in various distractor tasks. Neurophysiological arousal was measured via EEG. Additionally, subjective workload and objective driving performance were assessed. Frontal beta and gamma power exhibited their highest levels during tasks involving higher-order cognitive and visual demands. The higher-order cognitive condition was rated as the most mentally demanding. In comparison, the visual condition had the most significant impact on both the standard deviation of speed and standard deviation of lateral positioning. This study has significant implications for all road users, particularly those aged 18–25 years, and it reinforces the importance of not using a phone while driving.
Modelling the response times of mobile phone distracted young drivers: A hybrid approach of decision tree and random parameters duration model
2023, Analytic Methods in Accident ResearchResearch has shown the detrimental effects of using mobile phones whilst driving, which are more prominent and concerning for young drivers, who are often less experienced and riskier. As such, this study investigates young drivers’ response times when they encounter a safety–critical event on a suburban road whilst using a mobile phone. To collect high-quality trajectory data, the CARRS-Q advanced driving simulator was used. Thirty-two licenced young drivers were exposed to the sudden braking of the lead vehicle in their lane in three driving conditions: baseline (no phone conversation), handheld, and hands-free. Unlike extant studies, this paper proposes a hybrid modelling framework for the response times of distracted drivers. This framework combines a decision tree model and a correlated grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means. While the decision tree model identifies a priori relationship among main effects, the random parameter model captures unobserved heterogeneity and correlation between random parameters. The modelling results reveal that mobile phone distraction impairs response time behaviour for the majority of drivers. However, some drivers tend to respond earlier whilst being distracted, suggesting that the perceived risk of mobile use might have led to an early response, indicating their risk compensation behaviour. Female drivers tend to respond earlier compared to male drivers, indicating their safer and risk-averse behaviour. Overall, mobile phone distraction appears to deteriorate response time behaviour and poses a significant safety concern to drivers and the overall traffic stream unless mitigated.
Do driver monitoring technologies improve the driving behaviour of distracted drivers? A simulation study to assess the impact of an auditory driver distraction warning device on driving performance
2023, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and BehaviourBeing distracted while driving is a major cause of road crashes. To help prevent this particular type of crash, new driver monitoring technologies track ocular and head movement and alert drivers when periods of prolonged distraction are detected, thus preventing hazardous situations on the road. In this mixed-factorial multi-level experiment, the behaviour of drivers was measured as they performed a secondary task while being monitored via an auditory Driver Distraction Warning (A-DDW) device which reminded them to look at the road ahead and cease the activity which was the source of distraction. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of this type of DDW device by measuring longitudinal and lateral behaviour in situations where the driver is intentionally distracted for a significant period of time, and when the device repeatedly reminds the driver of his/her primary task.
Forty-two participants were randomly stratified into three groups and subjected to the following distraction levels: (i) not distracted (baseline), (ii) distracted, and (iii) distracted but interacting with the A-DDW device. All participants drove in (i) free-flowing and (ii) stable traffic conditions along straight motorway segments. Speed and speed deviation values for distracted drivers were lower than for undistracted ones but they also experienced a significant deterioration in vehicle lateral control. Conversely, drivers assisted by the A-DDW device experienced a considerable improvement in their lateral control even though their speed and speed deviation values were higher. The reaction times of distracted drivers interacting with the A-DDW device deteriorated as revealed in cognitive tests conducted before and after the driving task.
Distracting tasks have persisting effects on young and older drivers’ braking performance
2021, Accident Analysis and PreventionIt is well established that car driving performance suffers when the driver concurrently engages in a distracting activity, such as talking on a cell phone. The present study investigates whether the effects of driver distraction are short-lived, or rather persist for some time. Age-related differences are evaluated as well. Sixty-three young and 61 older adults were tested in a driving simulator. They were asked to follow a lead car that drove at a constant speed, and to concurrently engage in a pseudorandom sequence of distracting tasks (typing, reasoning, memorizing). When the lead car braked, participants had to brake as well to prevent a collision. The stimulus onset asynchrony between the braking task and the last preceding distraction was 11.49 ± 1.99 s. Each person was tested once in a multitasking condition (as described above), and once in a control condition without distracting tasks. Outcome measures quantified distance keeping and lane keeping while participants braked to the lead car. We found that braking responses differed significantly between conditions; this difference could be interpreted as a combination of performance deficits and compensatory strategies in the multitasking condition compared to the control condition. We also found significant differences between age groups, which could be interpreted similarly. Differences between age groups were less pronounced in the multitasking than in the control condition. All observed effects were associated with participants’ executive functioning. Our findings confirm that distractions have an impact on braking responses, and they document for the first time that this impact can persist for about 11.5 s. We attribute this persistence to a task set effect, and discuss the practical relevance of our findings.
Safety of motorised two wheelers in mixed traffic conditions: Literature review of risk factors
2021, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)The ownership of motorised two wheelers (MTWs) has been on the rise across various countries across the globe. The growth has been especially higher in developing countries which have typical traffic characteristics and higher populations. This steady rise has resulted in increased accident and fatalities. This abrupt increase warranted attention from the researchers to carry out specific studies for MTWs, which have a very different behaviour as compared to cars in terms of physical and dynamic parameters. Moreover, the unique traffic patterns usually found in the developing countries pose an additional challenge to the researchers, since the conventional focus of transportation safety researchers was a homogeneous car-based traffic. Many such studies have been attempted, especially in the recent decades, which have considered various risk factors related to MTW safety. However, the studies have considered different sets of risk factors and have given surprising and even conflicting results. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the diverse studies needs to be carried out which incorporates all the risk factors considered in previous research. This study reviews such research papers which have analysed various risk factors related to safety of MTWs, especially in heterogeneous, non-lane based traffic. Specifically, this paper aims to incorporate results from those studies and highlight the conclusions from state of the art. The paper also discusses about the research gaps that are crucial for MTW safety in mixed traffic conditions. The review will be useful for researchers working in the field of MTW safety and for policy implementation and analysis.
The effects of cognitive distraction on behavioural, oculomotor and electrophysiological metrics during a driving hazard perception task
2020, Accident Analysis and PreventionPrevious research has demonstrated that the distraction caused by holding a mobile telephone conversation is not limited to the period of the actual conversation (Haigney, 1995; Redelmeier & Tibshirani, 1997; Savage et al., 2013). In a prior study we identified potential eye movement and EEG markers of cognitive distraction during driving hazard perception. However the extent to which these markers are affected by the demands of the hazard perception task are unclear. Therefore in the current study we assessed the effects of secondary cognitive task demand on eye movement and EEG metrics separately for periods prior to, during and after the hazard was visible. We found that when no hazard was present (prior and post hazard windows), distraction resulted in changes to various elements of saccadic eye movements. However, when the target was present, distraction did not affect eye movements.
We have previously found evidence that distraction resulted in an overall decrease in theta band output at occipital sites of the brain. This was interpreted as evidence that distraction results in a reduction in visual processing. The current study confirmed this by examining the effects of distraction on the lambda response component of subjects eye fixation related potentials (EFRPs). Furthermore, we demonstrated that although detections of hazards were not affected by distraction, both eye movement and EEG metrics prior to the onset of the hazard were sensitive to changes in cognitive workload. This suggests that changes to specific aspects of the saccadic eye movement system could act as unobtrusive markers of distraction even prior to a breakdown in driving performance.