Paper
The identification of mistakes in road accident records: Part 2, casualty variables

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(94)00066-UGet rights and content

Abstract

It has been acknowledged that there are many mistakes in recording the casualty variables on the police accident report forms. This study shows how a computer-based linkage of police and hospital records can be used routinely to identify the mistakes for the variables of casualty age, gender, and severity. The level of omissions and misidentifications were 0.4% for gender, 12.2% for severity, and 15.7% for age. The number of records that had age omitted or coded incorrectly was not significantly greater for seriously injured casualties than for those who were slightly injured. This system could be effectively used to code casualty severity using medical information instead of police judgement.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

  • Risk factors of road accident severity and the development of a new system for prevention: New insights from China

    2020, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    In most studies, two main sources of data have been used to investigate the factors that determine accident severity. The first includes data obtained from government offices, administrations or ministries (Manner and Wünsch-Ziegler, 2013; Feng et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018 among others), which is also known as police-recorded data (Shinar et al., 1983; Austin, 1995; Conche and Tight, 2006; Loo, 2006). The second type of data is obtained from the insurance and reinsurance companies (Krishnan and Carnahan, 1985; Mills and Hambly, 2011).

  • Errors in accident data, its types, causes and methods of rectification-analysis of the literature

    2019, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Most studies that reported error in recording victim’s information focused primarily on the mis-classification of victim’s injuries. In this area one of the earliest studies done in UK was by Austin (1995b), who reported that the level of error due to omissions and misidentifications in the police reported accident data was 0.4% for gender, 12.2% for severity and 15.7% for age. Upon comparing the values calculated from Giles (2001) with Howard et al. (1979), the level of error related to victim’s information in Australia was found to increase over the period of time.

  • The association of age, sex and helmet use with the risk of death for occupants of two-wheeled motor vehicles involved in traffic crashes in Spain

    2010, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another potential limitation is that our results may have been affected by gaps in the data from the Spanish traffic crash registry. Although the accuracy and completeness of the registry have not been assessed, we assume that, like other police-based registries (Alsop and Langley, 2001; Austin, 1995; Farmer, 2003), it tends to under-record the occurrence of less severe crashes and those that occur in urban settings (the vast majority of TWMV crashes occur on urban streets and thoroughfares). Therefore subgroups of TWMV occupants associated with a lower joint risk of death after a crash (i.e., females or helmeted occupants) were probably underestimated in the denominator of their corresponding risks of death.

  • Performing chart review studies

    2007, Air Medical Journal
  • Use of CCTV to determine road accident factors in urban areas

    2006, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    In Britain, from January 2005, information on contributory factors is routinely collected as part of the national accident data collection system known as STATS 19 (DfT, 2004). Accident data suffer from two main problems: under-reporting (James, 1991; Hopkin, 1993; Austin, 1995a; Simpson, 1996; Dhillon et al., 2001; Alsop and Langley, 2001; Amoros et al., 2006) and inaccuracy. This paper focuses more on the use of video records to enhance the accuracy of our understanding of known accidents, however, it is acknowledged an additional benefit could be that the techniques described will pick up accidents which had not previously been reported to the authorities, though it is unclear how frequently such events may be identifiable.

View all citing articles on Scopus

The author's current address is Halcrow Fox and Associates Ltd, Vineyard House, 44 Brook Green, London W6 7BY, U.K.

View full text