Abstract
In a prospective cohort of elderly persons, aged 70 years and over, we examined risk indicators for which data could be easily obtained, to construct risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures. Participants lived independently, in apartment houses for the elderly or in homes for the elderly. At baseline, information was obtained in 2578 subjects on age, gender, residence, mobility and the frequency of going outdoors. Mobility was measured using a walking score ranging from 1 (not able to walk independently) to 3 (able to walk independently for a fair distance). During the study period (median duration 3.5 years, maximum 4 years) 106 participants sustained a hip fracture and 60 participants suffered a distal forearm fracture. Women compared with men, adjusted for age, had a higher risk of hip fracture (adjusted relative risk (RR)=2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–4.3) and distal forearm fracture (RR=3.7, 95% CI 1.5–9.2). Age, adjusted for gender, was related to hip fractures only: the relative risk of fracture for those in the highest age category (>85 years) was 9.5 (95% CI 4.3–21.2) compared with those in the lowest age category (70–75 years). Moderately impaired walking ability compared with normal walking ability, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with a higher risk of hip fracture (RR=1.8, 95% CI 1.2–2.7) but with a lower risk of distal forearm fracture (RR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.8). The outdoor score, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with distal forearm fractures only: going outdoors less than once a week, compared with three times or more, was associated with a lower risk of fractures (RR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.9). In those living in homes for the elderly the risk of hip fracture was higher compared with those living independently (RR=2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.2), adjusted for age and gender. Risk profiles were constructed using stepwise Cox's proportional-hazards regression. The risk profile predicted probabilites of sustaining a hip fracture in a 4-year period ranging from 0.4% to 25.9%, and of distal forearm fractures ranging from 0.2% to 4.5%, depending on the subject's characteristics as defined by the risk indicators. We conclude that easily obtainable risk indicators can be used in the prediction of fractures and can discriminate among fracture types.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kanis JA, and the WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. Osteoporosis Int 1994;4:368–81.
Black DM, Cummings SR, Melton LJ III. Appendicular bone mineral and a woman's lifetime risk of hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:639–46.
Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 1993;341:72–5.
Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. N Engl J Med 1995;332:767–73.
Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Glüer CC, Palermo L, Black D. Genant HK. Simple measurement of hip geometry predicts hip fracture: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1211–7.
Hemenway D, Azrael DR, Rimm EB, Feskanich D, Willett WC. Risk factors for wrist fractures: effect of age, cigarettes, alcohol, body height, relative weight, and handedness on the risk for distal forearm fractures in men. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:361–7.
Hui SL. Slemenda CW, Johnston CC. Baseline measurements of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:355–61.
Kelsey JL, Browner WS, Seeley DG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm and the proximal humerus. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:477–89.
Seeley DG, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, et al. Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? Ann Intern Med 1991;115:837–42.
Lips P, Graafmans WC, Ooms ME, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM. Vitamin D supplementation and fracture incidence in elderly persons: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:400–6.
Lips P, van Ginkel FC, Netelenbos JC, Wiersinga A, van der Vijgh WJF. Lower mobility and markers of bone resorption in the elderly. Bone Miner 1990;9:49–57.
Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
Johnell O, Gullberg B, Allander E, Kanis JA, and the MEDOS Study Group. The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources. Ostoporosis Int 1992;2:298–302.
Ooms ME, Vlasman P, Lips P, Nauta J, Bouter LM. Valkenburg HA. The incidence of hip fractures in independent and institutionalized elderly people. Osteoporosis Int 1994;4:6–10.
Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA, Resnick NM, Hayes WC. Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. JAMA 1994;271:128–33.
Nguyen T, Sambrook P, Kelly P, et al. Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by postural instability and bone density. BMJ 1993;307:1111–5.
King MB, Tinetti ME. Falls in community-dwelling older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:1146–54.
Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, and The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:1226–34.
O'Neill TW, Varlow J, Silman AJ, et al. Age and sex influences on fall characteristics. Ann Rheum Dis 1994;53:773–5.
Studenski S, Duncan PW, Chandler J, Samsa G, Prescott B, Hogue C, Bearon LB. Predicting falls: the role of mobility and nonphysical factors. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:297–302.
Coupland C, Wood D, Cooper C. Physical inactivity is an independent risk factor for hip fracture in the elderly. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993;47:441–3.
Cummings RG, Klineberg RJ. Case-control study of risk factors for hip fractures in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139:493–503
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graafmans, W.C., Ooms, M.E., Bezemer, P.D. et al. Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures: A prospective study. Osteoporosis Int 6, 427–431 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01629573
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01629573