Regular ArticleDrunk-Driving Research and Innovation: A Factorial Survey Study of Decisions To Drink and Drive
References (0)
Cited by (27)
False positive and false negative rates in self-reported intentions to offend: A replication and extension
2014, Journal of Criminal JusticeCitation Excerpt :Hypothetical scenarios and their corresponding SRIO scores are popular tools through which to study criminal decision making. Much of the research in this area finds evidence of a deterrent effect (e.g., Bachman et al., 1992; Higgins, Wilson, & Fell, 2005; Klepper & Nagin, 1989; Piquero & Pogarsky, 2002; Pogarsky, 2002; Pogarsky & Piquero, 2004; Sitren & Applegate, 2007; Thurman et al., 1993); yet, this conclusion is valid only to the degree that participants’ self-reported criminal intentions are predictive of their real world behaviors. While there is evidence to suggest that intentions are reasonably strong predictors of prosocial behaviors, Exum et al. (2012) raised questions about the predictive accuracy of individuals’ intentions to engage in an illegal activity—specifically, a certain form of music piracy.
25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review
2009, Social Science ResearchDrink driving deterrents and self-reported offending behaviours among a sample of Queensland motorists
2009, Journal of Safety ResearchPerceptions of level of intoxication and risk related to drinking and driving
2008, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Driving distance has also been associated with one's perceptions regarding being in an accident or being arrested, as well as related to one's decision to drink and drive. Specifically, individuals are more likely to drink and drive if they only have a short distance to drive (MacDonald et al., 1995; Thurman, Jackson, & Zhao, 1993; Turrisi & Jaccard, 1991). Perceptions of risk play an important role in one's decision to drinking and drive.
General deterrence effects of U.S. statutory DUI fine and jail penalties: Long-term follow-up in 32 states
2007, Accident Analysis and PreventionCitation Excerpt :Nineteen of the 39 studies reviewed examined the effects of DUI fines (Table 1). Outcomes include fatal crashes (Briskcoe, 2004; Chaloupka et al., 1993; Chang and Yeh, 2004; Deshapriya and Iwase, 1996; Homel, 1994; Kim et al., 2006; Legge and Park, 1994; Sen, 2001; Sloan and Reilly, 1994; Sloan et al., 1995; Whetten-Goldstein et al., 2000; Young and Likens, 2000), DUI recidivism (Martin et al., 1993; Taxman and Piquero, 1998; Yu, 1994, 2000; Yu and Willford, 1995), other non-traffic injuries and mortality (Sloan and Reilly, 1994), and miscellaneous outcomes such as self-reported intentions to drink and drive (Sloan and Reilly, 1994; Sloan et al., 1995; Stout et al., 2000; Thurman et al., 1993). Of the 19 studies, only six found significant effects of DUI fines in decreasing outcomes studied.
Women drivers' behavior in well-known versus less familiar locations
2007, Journal of Safety Research