Elsevier

Social Science Research

Volume 22, Issue 3, September 1993, Pages 245-264
Social Science Research

Regular Article
Drunk-Driving Research and Innovation: A Factorial Survey Study of Decisions To Drink and Drive

https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1993.1012Get rights and content

Abstract

Drunk driving continues to be a heavily studied research topic. However, despite much emphasis on the study of individual behavior using conventional survey techniques, new insight into the problem of drunk driving has been slow to develop. The study described below uses factorial surveys to examine the drunk-driving judgments of a national probability sample of 528 nonabstaining adults. These data suggest that key components in decisions to drink and drive include the extent of the driver′s behavioral impairment, the availability of drunk-driving alternatives, weather conditions, the number of miles that have to be driven after drinking, the legal consequences of drunk driving (in terms of jail sentences and license revocations), the community response to drunk driving, where drinking occurs, fines that might be issued, the use of traffic roadblocks, and the driver′s familiarity with roads that must be driven after a drinking event. The analysis undertaken also shows that the influence of these same factors varies across levels of drunk driving experience, suggesting that those persons most experienced with drunk driving tend to rate legal sanctions as more important in judgments to drink and drive than those persons who typically refrain from drunk driving.

References (0)

Cited by (27)

  • False positive and false negative rates in self-reported intentions to offend: A replication and extension

    2014, Journal of Criminal Justice
    Citation Excerpt :

    Hypothetical scenarios and their corresponding SRIO scores are popular tools through which to study criminal decision making. Much of the research in this area finds evidence of a deterrent effect (e.g., Bachman et al., 1992; Higgins, Wilson, & Fell, 2005; Klepper & Nagin, 1989; Piquero & Pogarsky, 2002; Pogarsky, 2002; Pogarsky & Piquero, 2004; Sitren & Applegate, 2007; Thurman et al., 1993); yet, this conclusion is valid only to the degree that participants’ self-reported criminal intentions are predictive of their real world behaviors. While there is evidence to suggest that intentions are reasonably strong predictors of prosocial behaviors, Exum et al. (2012) raised questions about the predictive accuracy of individuals’ intentions to engage in an illegal activity—specifically, a certain form of music piracy.

  • Perceptions of level of intoxication and risk related to drinking and driving

    2008, Addictive Behaviors
    Citation Excerpt :

    Driving distance has also been associated with one's perceptions regarding being in an accident or being arrested, as well as related to one's decision to drink and drive. Specifically, individuals are more likely to drink and drive if they only have a short distance to drive (MacDonald et al., 1995; Thurman, Jackson, & Zhao, 1993; Turrisi & Jaccard, 1991). Perceptions of risk play an important role in one's decision to drinking and drive.

  • General deterrence effects of U.S. statutory DUI fine and jail penalties: Long-term follow-up in 32 states

    2007, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nineteen of the 39 studies reviewed examined the effects of DUI fines (Table 1). Outcomes include fatal crashes (Briskcoe, 2004; Chaloupka et al., 1993; Chang and Yeh, 2004; Deshapriya and Iwase, 1996; Homel, 1994; Kim et al., 2006; Legge and Park, 1994; Sen, 2001; Sloan and Reilly, 1994; Sloan et al., 1995; Whetten-Goldstein et al., 2000; Young and Likens, 2000), DUI recidivism (Martin et al., 1993; Taxman and Piquero, 1998; Yu, 1994, 2000; Yu and Willford, 1995), other non-traffic injuries and mortality (Sloan and Reilly, 1994), and miscellaneous outcomes such as self-reported intentions to drink and drive (Sloan and Reilly, 1994; Sloan et al., 1995; Stout et al., 2000; Thurman et al., 1993). Of the 19 studies, only six found significant effects of DUI fines in decreasing outcomes studied.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text