Table 3

Incidence of hospitalised cases of dog-bite injuries in the preimplementation and postimplementation period of BSL in the province of Manitoba

Preimplementation period of BSL* Postimplementation period of BSLp Value of difference in incidence between preimplementation and postimplementation periods
Total numberIncidence (95% CI) per 100 000 person-yearsTotal numberIncidence (95% CI) per 100 000 person-years
All Manitoba jurisdictions507 3.47 (3.17 to 3.77)§ 3312.84 (2.53 to 3.15)§ 0.005
 All jurisdictions that did not implement BSL in the years 1984–20063633.62 (3.25 to 3.99) ** NANANA
  City of Brandon242.50 (1.61 to 3.72)†† ‡‡ NANANA
  Town of Flin Flon74.24 (1.70 to 8.73)§§ ¶¶ NANANA
 All jurisdictions that implemented BSL sometime during years 1984–2006*** 1443.14 (2.65 to 3.69) 3312.84 (2.53 to 3.15)** 0.319
  City of Winnipeg1102.93 (2.41 to 3.53)†† 3072.81 (2.49 to 3.12)‡‡ 0.697
  The Pas126.21 (3.21 to 10.85)§§ 00.00 (0.00 to 22.30)¶¶ 0.999
  • * The entire study period (1984–2006) is considered as pre-BSL implementation period for all jurisdictions that did not implement BSL during our study period.

  • 95% Poisson CI.

  • Includes 363 hospitalisations from jurisdictions with no BSL and 144 hospitalisations pre-BSL implementations from jurisdictions with BSL.

  • § Percentage change in incidence=−18.1%.

  • Different at p value=0.145.

  • ** Different at p value=0.001 and percentage change in incidence=−21.5%.

  • †† Different at p value=0.477.

  • ‡‡ Different at p value=0.581.

  • §§ Different at p value=0.422.

  • ¶¶ Different at p value=0.999.

  • *** Includes 16 jurisdictions with ‘pit-bull’ specific bans listed in table 1.

  • BSL, breed-specific legislation.