Table 4

The leisure environment: prevention of leisure injuries

Author, date, and countryInjury target group and settingAims and content of interventionStudy type and sample sizeOutcome measuresKey results
C = control; I = intervention.
D'Argenio et al (1996),12 ItalyGeneral population and focus on children 10–14“Capodanno Senza Danno” (New Year's without Harm!) Firework campaign and law enforcementBefore and after study. I = 18 emergency rooms(A) Morbidity data—emergency room records. (B) Fireworks confiscated(A) In 10–12 year olds rate of firework injuries dropped 51% from 46/100 000 to 22.3/100 000. (B) 12.5 million fireworks confiscated by police (82% more than previous year) InconclusiveReasonable/weak evidence
Malinowska-Cieslik and Borne (1998),13 Poland6–11 years. Schools and communityMultimethod mushroom poisoning prevention programmeBefore and after study. I=693 children(A) Mortality, morbidity (B) Knowledge(A) Unspecified reductions in hospitalisations and mortality. (B) Knowledge levels increased Partially effectiveReasonable/weak evidence
Withaneachi and Meehan (1998),14 AustraliaPrimary school aged children. SchoolEducational intervention on playground safety standards in school playgroundsBefore and after study. No control. I pre-test=20 schools Post-test=19 schools(A) Observed hazards in playground(A) Improvements on most of safety standards Before 99/125 pieces of equipment met safety standard on fall height compared with 88/94 Partially effective/inconclusiveReasonable/weak evidence
Bennett et al (1999),15 USA1–14 years. Community basedDrowning prevention campaign, life vest loan programme, and bulk discount schemesBefore and after study without control group I1=(before) 332 I3=(after) 480Reported ownership and use of life vestsReported ownership 69% before and 75% after campaign. Reported use increased from 20% to 29% EffectiveReasonable/weak evidence
Sibert et al (1999),16 Wales, UKChildren using public playgroundsEnvironmental changes to playgrounds, depth of impact absorbing surfaces (bark) and changes to equipmentControlled trial without randomisation. I=5 parks, C=18 parks (no changes)(A) Injury rates (B) Number of fracturesIn I, (A) Injury rate changed from 0.719 before to 0.297 after. In C, from 0.433 to 0.346 after (B) in I, fractures changed from 23 to 6. In C, from 12 to 10 Partially effectiveReasonable evidence