Table 4

Intervention studies measuring fire related morbidity and mortality

InterventionCountry (population)Study periodStudy designSubjects (intervention group)Subjects (control group)Data sourcesOutcomes measuredResults (control group or before)Results (intervention group or after)Reference
Notes: E-quasi = quasiexperimental design; E-natural = natural experiment; SD = smoke detector.
Smoke detector giveawaysUSA (county)1987–90E-quasiUrban area with highest injury rates (n=10 100)Remainder of the cityHospital, fire, medical examiner, vital statistics reports, mediaIncidence-density ratio, before v after1.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.7)0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.4) 5
Rate ratio of injury rate/100 fires before v after1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.0)0.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.6)
USA (city)1984–5Program evaluationUrban areas with substandard housingNo control groupMortality dataResidential fire death32 in 198416 in 1985 53
Firefighter report of averted injury due to SDAverted injury (# cases)Unknown65
Education programUSA (cities)1977–8E-quasiCommunities exposed to intensive education programsSimilar communitiesHospital recordsIncidence rate ratio, before v after1.0 (95% CI 0.6 to 1.5)School program 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6) 54
Community program 0.8 (95%CI 0.5 to 1.1)
Media campaign 1.2 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.7)
Media campaign, product and legislation changesDenmark (city: burn unit)1968–84E-naturalBurn unit referral areaNo control groupMorbidity and mortality dataBurn injury incidence3% Decrease per year 55