FB program effects on alcohol involved fatal crashes
| Individual FBAT communities | Program effect at 0.01%+BAC OR (95% CI) | Program effect at 0.08%+BAC OR (95% CI) | Program effect at 0.15%+BAC OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| *Pooled analysis of five FB communities showed significant heterogeneity of program effect at BAC levels of 0.01%+ and 0.08%+. Pooled analysis of three FB communities showed significant heterogeneity of program effect at BAC levels of 0.01%+ and 0.08%+. Pooled analysis of FB communities not targeting alcohol availability and increased treatment showed significant heterogeneity of effect at BAC levels of 0.01%+. | |||
| NS, not significant. | |||
| Kansas City | 0.83 (0.61–1.12) | 0.86 (0.63–1.18) | 0.80 (0.57–1.13) |
| Milwaukee | 0.55 (0.31–0.98) | 0.57 (0.31–1.04) | 0.54 (0.28–1.04) |
| San Antonio | 0.95 (0.79–1.15) | 0.95 (0.79–1.16) | 0.95 (0.77–1.18) |
| Santa Barbara | 0.87 (0.37–2.02) | 0.99 (0.41–2.38) | 1.01 (0.39–2.60) |
| Vallejo | 0.69 (0.63–0.76) | 0.63 (0.50–0.80) | 0.58 (0.39–0.87) |
| Pooled effect* | 0.78 (0.64–0.95) | 0.80 (0.71–0.92) | 0.83 (0.71–0.97) |
| Five FBAT communities targeting alcohol availability and increased treatment | Relative reduction 22% | Relative reduction 20% | Relative reduction 17% |
| p = 0.01 | p<0.001 | p = 0.02 | |
| Pooled effect* | 0.69 (0.63–0.76) | 0.64 (0.52–0.79) | 0.61 (0.44–0.84) |
| Three FBAT programs covering entire community | Relative reduction 31% | Relative reduction 36% | Relative reduction 39% |
| p<0.001 | p<0.001 | p = 0.003 | |
| Seven FB communities not targeting alcohol availability and increased treatment* | 1.31 (0.93–1.85) | 1.17 (0.97–1.41) | 1.11 (0.90–1.37) |
| Relative increase 31% | Relative increase 17% | Relative increase 11% | |
| NS | NS | NS | |