Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
Road traffic injuries in conflict areas
  1. Luis Manuel Rosa Sosa1,
  2. Junaid A Bhatti2,3
  1. 1Première Urgence-Aide Médicale Internationale (PU-AMI) France, Kabul, Afghanistan
  2. 2Public Health Solutions Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited, Lahore, Pakistan
  3. 3Douglas Hospital Research Center, McGill University, Addiction Research Program, Montreal, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Luis Manuel Rosa Sosa, Première Urgence-Aide Médicale Internationale (PU-AMI), House 59, St. 5, D 10, Qala-e-Fatullah, Kabul, Afghanistan; afg.depmedco{at}pu-ami.org, luis1979rosa{at}yahoo.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The United Nations (UN) has proclaimed the years 2011–2020 as the Decade of Action for Road Safety.1 The related public health actions are of particular importance to those living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).2 These actions are more focused on highly populated LMICs where development needs have been leading to increased motorisation, and consequently road traffic injury burden.1 While fatality counts and motorisation may be important aspects in deciding action priorities, such categorisation is likely to neglect a noticeable number of countries currently facing a wave of political violence and conflict.3

One such country is Afghanistan where people's livelihood has been ravaged by ongoing conflicts during the last 3 decades.3 ,4 In 2009, WHO estimated that Afghanistan had one of the highest traffic fatality rates worldwide leading to over 10 000 road fatalities per year.2 However, due to the conflict situation, traffic safety problem has not been highlighted in the disease burden reports concerning Afghanistan.3 Our analyses of injury-related hospitalisation data from three different provinces of Afghanistan clearly showed that road disease burden competed with violence-related injuries (see table 1). Though the contribution of traffic injuries in overall injury burden was moderate (15.1% in 2010) in Kunar province which is in East of Kabul and the epicentre of current conflict, such contributions were relatively higher in the provinces of Laghman (41.4%) and Samangan (27.1%). Even more interesting was the fact that traffic injury hospitalisations increased in all three provinces from 2008 to 2010.

Table 1

Injury mechanisms of admitted cases in the three provincial hospitals of Afghanistan (April 2008–December 2010)—Source: MoPH/HMIS*

Some authors in the past have warned that violence-related prevention can be overprioritised in the public health action agenda.5 Our results clearly indicated that traffic injuries continue to contribute substantially in the injury burden in conflict affected regions. In our opinion, traffic safety advocacy in the conflict affected countries like Afghanistan should not be overlooked as this can undermine the UN and WHO agenda to reduce traffic injuries in coming years.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr Carole Deglise, PU-AMI Health Advisor for Asia region, for suggestions to improve the clarity of our letter.

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors LMRS and JAB contributed equally in study conception, data analyses and result interpretation. Both authors read the final text before submission.

  • Competing interests LMRS works in Première Urgence Aide Médicale Internationale, which is an International Non-Governmental Organisation having provided healthcare services in the three provinces of Afghanistan. The authors have identified no conflict of interests.

  • Disclaimer The interpretations of presented data reflect authors’ views and did not represent the standpoint of their affiliated or the data reporting institutions.

  • Ethics approval Study is based on the analyses of de-nominalized administrative dataset. The research plan was approved by PU-AMI.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.