Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Comparison of urban and rural non-fatal injury: the results of a statewide survey
  1. M Leff1,
  2. L Stallones2,
  3. T J Keefe3,
  4. R Rosenblatt4,
  5. M Reeds4
  1. 1Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences and Colorado Injury Control Research Center, Colorado State University, Ft Collins
  2. 2Department of Psychology and Colorado Injury Control Research Center, Colorado State University, Ft Collins
  3. 3Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft Collins
  4. 4Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver
  1. Correspondence to:
 Marilyn Leff
 Colorado Injury Control Research Center, Colorado State University, Ft Collins, CO 80523-1676, USA; marilyn.leffcolostate.edu

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the epidemiology of non-fatal injury among urban and rural residents of Colorado.

Design: A stratified probability sample with random digit dial methods was used to survey Colorado residents by telephone regarding injuries experienced in the last 12 months. Questions on the cause of the injury, the activity at the time of the injury, and the place of injury were based on the Nordic Medico Statistical Committee’s (NOMESCO) classification of external causes of injuries.

Subjects: A total of 1425 urban and 1275 rural Colorado residents aged 18 and older were interviewed.

Results: Age, gender, marital status, and rural residency were found to increase the odds of self reported injury. The adjusted odds ratio for self reported injury was 1.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.68) for rural compared with urban residents. Rural residence (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.51 to 7.01) was not a risk factor for injury among the highest risk group, those who were single and never married. No differences in injury characteristics were found by urban-rural status.

Conclusions: The increased odds of self reported injury among rural residents were not explained by differences in the causes of injury or other injury characteristics. The differences in the importance of rural residence in increased odds of injury by marital status warrants further understanding and may be important in the development of injury prevention programs. Based on comparison with a similar survey, the NOMESCO coding system appears to be a viable alternative survey tool for gathering information on injury characteristics.

  • urban
  • rural
  • survey
  • NOMESCO
  • marital status
  • BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
  • NOMESCO, Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee
  • CMSA, consolidated metropolitan statistical area
  • MSA, metropolitan statistical area
  • CI, confidence interval
  • urban
  • rural
  • survey
  • NOMESCO
  • marital status
  • BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
  • NOMESCO, Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee
  • CMSA, consolidated metropolitan statistical area
  • MSA, metropolitan statistical area
  • CI, confidence interval

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.