rss
Inj Prev 7:343-344 doi:10.1136/ip.7.4.343-a
  • LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Safety in numbers? A new dimension to the bicycle helmet controversy

  1. C Komanoff
  1. Right Of Way, 636 Broadway, Room 602, New York, NY 10012–2623, USA kea@igc.org

      Editor,—The recent exchange about risk compensation and bicycle helmets overlooked an important dimension of the issue.1,2 By reducing cycling and, hence, diluting the effect of “safety in numbers”, compulsory helmet laws could have the perverse effect of increasing serious injury rates among those who continue to cycle.

      Nearly all fatal cycling crashes involve motorists. But there is evidence that the rate of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes declines as the amount of cycling on a road or in a region increases. This “safety in numbers” effect is thought to occur because as cyclists grow more numerous and come to be an expected part of the road environment, motorists become more mindful of their presence and more respectful of their rights.

      The implication is that adding cyclists to the road makes it less likely that a motorist …

      Free sample
      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Injury Prevention.
      View free sample issue >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

      Navigate This Article