rss
Inj Prev 5:214-216 doi:10.1136/ip.5.3.214
  • METHODOLOGIC ISSUES

Sensitivity and representativeness of a childhood injury surveillance system

Table 1

Representativeness of the CHIRPP: Ottawa-Carleton region, Ontario, Canada, summer 1992

Predictor variable No Missed by CHIRPP (%) Odds ratio of being missed (unadjusted) 95% Confidence interval
Sex
    Male 1416 36 1.08 0.91 to 1.28
    Female 964 34 1.00
Day
    Weekend 784 37 1.13 0.94 to 1.34
    Weekday 1601 34 1.00
Time of presentation
    Night (1701-0759) 1212 33 0.85 0.72 to 1.01
    Day (0800-1700) 1165 37 1.00
Injury intent
    Unintentional 2326 35 0.44 0.14 to 1.46
    Intentional 11 55 1.00
Nature of injury
    Laceration/abrasion 617 41 1.37 1.11 to 1.68
    Sprain 268 44 1.55 1.18 to 2.03
    Fracture/dislocation 455 24 0.60 0.47 to 0.78
    Concussion 24 17 0.39 0.14 to 1.10
    Other 1011 34 1.00
Disposition
    Admitted 76 17 0.37 0.20 to 0.68
    Treated and released 2295 36 1.00
Age (years)
    >14 503 59 3.57 2.91 to 4.38
    ≤14 1843 29 1.00
Total 2386 35

This Article

Blogs and Podcasts

Blogs and Podcasts

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Injury Prevention.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.