Article Text

PDF
1021 A study on differences of survival swimming courses in Thailand
  1. Som Ekchaloemkiet,
  2. Suchada Gerdmongkolgan
  1. Bureau of Non-Communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand

Abstract

Background In Thailand, drowning is the number one cause of death among children under 15 years of age. In this age group, there were 11,776 drowning deaths between 2005 and 2014, most of which occurred in natural water settings. Among children under 15 years, only 23.7% can swim, even though Thailand has implemented the survival swimming course since 2009. However, due to limitations in incorporating such lessons into the educational curriculums, the survival swimming course has to be taught in full and modified according to the situations of each locality, with differences in training periods and types of natural water.

Objective To study the differences in learning activities in various survival swimming courses in Thailand.

Methods This research was conducted to assess the differences in the learning activities for children in the survival swimming courses, both full courses and those modified according to the local context. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire and an in-depth interview form and then analysed to determine percentages and standard deviations; and t-test as well as odds ratio was performed.

Results The children who took the full survival swimming course were found to have better knowledge and skills in water safety, survival and problem-solving in emergency situation, than those who took the applied swimming courses. Their average score was significantly different (P < 0.05), but their average scores on water rescue skills were not different. Among full course children, their scores on water safety, water survival skills, water rescue skills, and problem-solving skills were 8.9-fold, 4.1-fold, 1.4-fold, and 10.3-fold higher than those taking the applied courses, respectively; and their capabilities in survival swimming and drowning prevention were 5.2-fold and 7.7-fold higher than those taking the applied courses, respectively.

Conclusion and discussion Children who took the full survival swimming course had better survival swimming capabilities and drowning prevention skills than those who took the applied course. However, the water rescue skills in both groups were not much different, probably because they all were taught to memorise the key message “shout, throw, and hand over” regularly and consistently during the course, not just during the lessons.

Recommendations For the maximum benefit of drowning prevention, the full survival swimming course should be used. But for developing countries with limited resources, the applied course might be used; and the knowledge and skills on this matter should also be taught while learning other subjects.

Definitions

  • Taking the full survival swimming course means intensive learning in all 3 modules for 15 hours at a standard swimming pool.

  • Taking the applied survival swimming course means learning in all 3 modules with different intensity levels, depending on the local context, not for all 15 hours, at a mobile swimming pool, a fish pond or a natural water setting.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.