Article Text

PDF
Bus stops and pedestrian–motor vehicle collisions in Lima, Peru: a matched case–control study
  1. D Alex Quistberg1,2,3,
  2. Thomas D Koepsell1,3,
  3. Brian D Johnston1,2,
  4. Linda Ng Boyle1,4,
  5. J Jaime Miranda5,6,
  6. Beth E Ebel1,2,3,7
  1. 1Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  4. 4Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  5. 5School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
  6. 6CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
  7. 7Seattle Children's Hospital and Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr D Alex Quistberg, Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359660, Seattle, WA 98104–2499, USA; aquistbe{at}uw.edu

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the relationship between bus stop characteristics and pedestrian–motor vehicle collisions.

Methods This was a matched case–control study where the units of study were pedestrian crossings in Lima, Peru. We performed a random sample of 11 police commissaries in Lima, Peru. Data collection occurred from February 2011 to September 2011. A total of 97 intersection cases representing 1134 collisions and 40 mid-block cases representing 469 collisions that occurred between October 2010 and January 2011, and their matched controls, were included. The main exposures assessed were presence of a bus stop and specific bus stop characteristics. The main outcome measure was occurrence of a pedestrian–motor vehicle collision.

Results Intersections with bus stops were three times more likely to have a pedestrian–vehicle collision (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.53 to 7.03), relative to intersections without bus stops. Formal and informal bus stops were associated with higher odds of a collision at intersections (OR 6.23, 95% CI 1.76 to 22.0 and OR 2.98, 1.37 to 6.49). At mid-block sites, bus stops on a bus-dedicated transit lane were also associated with collision risk (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.02 to 5.42). All bus stops were located prior to the intersection, contrary to practices in most high-income countries.

Conclusions In urban Lima, the presence of a bus stop was associated with a threefold increase in risk of a pedestrian collision. The highly competitive environment among bus companies may provide an economic incentive for risky practices, such as dropping off passengers in the middle of traffic and jockeying for position with other buses. Bus stop placement should be considered to improve pedestrian safety.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.