rss
Inj Prev 17:i28-i33 doi:10.1136/ip.2010.026849
  • Supplement

Analysis of paediatric drowning deaths in Washington State using the child death review (CDR) for surveillance: what CDR does and does not tell us about lethal drowning injury

  1. Elizabeth Bennett4
  1. 1University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
  2. 2Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, WA USA
  3. 3Public Health Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA USA
  4. 4Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Linda Quan, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, B-5520 Seattle, WA 98105, Linda, USA; linda.quan{at}seattlechildrens.org
  1. Contributors All authors were members of the Drowning Working Group of the WA CDR.

  • Accepted 30 November 2010

Abstract

Background Drowning is second cause of paediatric injury death in Washington State. Child death review (CDR) data provide the unique opportunity to identify regional risk factors and opportunities for drowning prevention.

Methods CDR teams' data for drowning deaths of children <18 years between 1999 and 2003 were analysed for victim and event characteristics, and existing prevention/protective factors. A working group made data driven recommendations. Subsequent interventions were noted.

Results Drowning death rates were significantly higher among Asian Pacific Islander children (3.3 per 100 000). Disproportionately, 32% of deaths involved families with prior child protective services (CPS) referrals. Most deaths (73%) occurred in open water; the proportion in open water increased from 42% of <5-year-olds, 83% of 5–9-year-olds, to 90% of 10–17-year-olds. Thirty per cent drowned at parks; 29% drowned in residential settings. Pre-drowning activity for 42% was swimming or playing in the water. Alcohol and drug use were low. Neglect/poor supervision was considered a factor in 68% (21/31) of the deaths of children <5 years of age. State CDR recommendations led to the development of a drowning prevention campaign targeted to an Asian American community, intra-agency changes resulting in reinstatement of lifeguard staffing and addition of lifejacket loaner programmes, collaboration with state commissions to enforce a state pool fencing ordinance, and model legislation prohibiting swimming in dangerous waterways.

Conclusion CDR data collection and review process was an effective surveillance tool. It identified specific regional high risk groups and sites for drowning prevention and led to recommendations and implementation of effective local and state injury prevention interventions.

Footnotes

  • All authors have been involved with the project design, implementation, review and writing of the paper.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Seattle Children's Hospital Institutional Review Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Injury Prevention.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article