Objective To illustrate the benefits and utility of the child death review (CDR) reporting system when examining risk factors associated with infant death occurring within two subgroups of sudden unexpected infant deaths (SUID)—unintentional suffocation and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)—in a large urban county in Wisconsin.
Design Retrospective CDR data were analysed, 2007–2008, for Milwaukee County, Wisconsin.
Patients or subjects Unintentional suffocation and SIDS infant deaths under 1 year of age in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, 2007–2008, with a CDR record indicating a death in a sleep environment.
Main outcome measure Study examined demographic characteristics, bed-sharing, incident sleep location, position of child when put to sleep, position of child when found, child's usual sleep place, crib in home, and other objects found in sleep environment.
Results Unintentional suffocation (n=11) and SIDS (n=40) classified deaths with CDR data made up 18% (51/283) of all infant deaths in Milwaukee County from 2007 to 2008. The majority of infants who died of unintentional suffocation (n=9, 81.8%) or SIDS (n=26, 65.0%) were black and under the age of 3 months. Bed-sharing was involved in most of the unintentional suffocation deaths (n=10, 90.9%) and the SIDS deaths (n=28, 70.0%). All unintentional suffocation deaths (n=11, 100%) and the majority of SIDS deaths (n=31, 77.5%) took place in a non-crib sleeping environment.
Conclusions The study demonstrates how CDR provides enhanced documentation of risk factors to help steer prevention efforts regarding SUID deaths in a community and reaffirms infants in an unsafe sleep environment have an increased risk of death.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding This work was partially supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Grants R49/CE00175 and 5U17CE524815-05 as well as the Keeping Kids Alive grant provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, The Wisconsin Partnership Program.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.