Article Text

PDF
An investigation into methods to develop indicators to measure injury related impairment
  1. Pauline Gulliver,
  2. Colin Cryer,
  3. Gabrielle Davie,
  4. John Langley
  1. Injury Prevention Research Unit, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Pauline Gulliver, Injury Prevention Research Unit, Dunedin School of Medicine, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand; Pauline.gulliver{at}ipru.otago.ac.nz

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether valid indicators of injury-related impairment could be developed based on data from a New Zealand national no-fault accident insurance scheme.

Design The feasibility of (1) developing impairment related indicators using insurance data directly, and (2) deriving diagnosis specific probability of impairment measures based on hospital discharge data were investigated.

Setting The source data were lump sum payment data for permanent impairment arising from an injury event between 1 April 2002 and 31 October 2006, and hospital discharge data for injury events between 1 April 2002 and 31 December 2005.

Main outcome measure A threat of impairment measure was developed that was based on a list of International Classification of Diseases codes (version 10) which, if assessed would attract a lump sum payment for permanent impairment, and would almost always be expected to be admitted to hospital.

Results A group of approximately 80 diagnoses satisfying the above criteria were identified. The trend in age standardised injury rates for the threat of impairment indicator is consistent with the trend for the New Zealand threat to life indicator.

Conclusions This work has provided a method for the development of hospital discharge-based serious threat of impairment injury indicators. This is an important first step in developing a comprehensive package of (threat of) disability indicators.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding The Accident Compensation Corporation, Shamrock House, 81–83 Molesworth St, PO Box 242, Wellington, New Zealand provided the funding for this research project. Views and/or conclusions in this paper are those of the project team and may not reflect the position of the ACC.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Accident Compensation Corporation ethics committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.