Article Text

PDF
Assessing the feasibility of distributing child poison safety messages through three existing parent information pathways
  1. L Gibbs1,
  2. E Waters1,
  3. J Robinson2,
  4. S Young3,
  5. A Hutchinson4
  1. 1
    McCaughey Centre, VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  2. 2
    Victorian Poisons Information Centre, Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children’s Hospital and the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
  4. 4
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr L Gibbs, Community Partnerships & Health Equity Research, The McCaughey Centre, VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia; lgibbs{at}unimelb.edu.au

Abstract

The objective of this exploratory study was to assess the feasibility of increasing parents’ poison safety awareness and behaviours using existing pathways. The aim was to compare the release of true stories of child unintentional poisoning via three modes: (a) parent “networker”; (b) maternal and child health nurse; (c) the media. The stories spread by the parent networker were readily recalled by the parents, with examples of changed behaviour and spreading of the stories. Parents who were part of the maternal and child health nurse strategy were not able to recall the stories without prompts. The media strategy could not be implemented because of difficulties finding parents ready to publicise their story. Given that it is an exploratory study, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of each of the intervention strategies. However, it appears that a low-resource intervention using stories shared via parent networkers may have exciting potential as a health promotion tool. A stronger study design to examine its effectiveness is proposed.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The Royal Children’s Hospital Research in Humans Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.