Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling
  1. P L Jacobsen1,
  2. F Racioppi2,
  3. H Rutter3
  1. 1
    2771 14th Street, Sacramento, California, USA
  2. 2
    Accidents, Transport and Health, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Rome, Italy
  3. 3
    National Obesity Observatory, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mr P L Jacobsen, 2771 14th Street, Sacramento, California 95818-2935, USA; jacobsen.peter{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of traffic on levels of walking and bicycling.

Method: Review of the literature of medical, public health, city planning, public administration and traffic engineering.

Results: The real and perceived danger and discomfort imposed by traffic discourage walking and bicycling. Accurately or not, pedestrians and bicyclists judge injury risk and respond accordingly. Although it can be difficult to measure these effects, observed behaviour provides good evidence for these effects, with the strongest association being an inverse correlation between volumes and speeds of traffic and levels of walking and cycling.

Conclusion: Interventions to reduce traffic speed and volume are likely to promote walking and bicycling and thus result in public health gains.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • See Commentary, p 362

  • Competing interests None.

  • We presented this paper, in an earlier form, at the 15 May 2006 WHO European Environment and Health Committee, Oslo.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles