rss
Inj Prev 2009;15:230-233 doi:10.1136/ip.2008.020537
  • Original Article

A comparison of booster seat use in Canadian provinces with and without legislation

  1. A Snowdon1,
  2. L Rothman2,
  3. M Slater2,
  4. C Kolga3,
  5. A Hussein1,
  6. P Boase4,
  7. A Howard2
  1. 1
    University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada
  2. 2
    Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
  3. 3
    St Clair College, Windsor, Canada
  4. 4
    Transport Canada, Ottawa, Canada
  1. Dr A Howard, Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada; andrew.howard{at}sickkids.ca
  • Accepted 15 May 2009

Abstract

Background: The use of booster seats continues to be low, despite their effectiveness in reducing injury in motor vehicle collisions. Many jurisdictions have introduced legislation requiring the use of booster seats. To date, there have been no Canadian studies evaluating the effectiveness of legislation on booster seat use.

Objectives: To describe restraint use among Canadian children aged 4–8 years, and compare booster seat use between provinces/territories with and without legislation.

Methods: The data were obtained from a National Survey of Child Restraint Use/Misuse conducted between June and August 2006. A roadside observation survey was conducted at 182 sites across Canada. Weighted statistical analyses of differences in proportions were conducted, accounting for sampling stratification and clustering by car effects.

Results: The roadside survey estimated that 24.6% of children aged 4–8 were restrained in booster seats in provinces with legislation, compared with 16.6% in provinces without (p<0.001).

Conclusion: This is the first Canadian national study using direct observation to determine the effect of legislation on booster seat use. Provinces with legislation had higher booster seat use, but overall rates were still disappointingly low. Ongoing surveillance of child safety seat use and evaluation of effective adjuncts to legislation is required in order to see collision-related child deaths and injuries drop in the future.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: The funding for this research was provided by AUTO21-A Network of Centres of Excellence supported by the Government of Canada.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
 This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Injury Prevention.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Injury Prevention. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.