Objective: To estimate and compare the rate of pedestrian injuries in primary school-attending children of urban Uganda using different data sources.
Design: Data collection from a hospital-based trauma registry, police data, teacher reports, and a cross-sectional community-based survey.
Setting: Kawempe, the largest urban district in the capital Kampala, Uganda.
Patients or subjects: Primary school-attending children aged 4–12 from 39 randomly selected schools were included in the trauma registry, police data, and teacher reports. 1828 households randomly selected from the 39 schools were interviewed for the community survey.
Main outcome measure: A pedestrian injury. For the trauma registry—defined as a pedestrian injury resulting in a visit to the hospital. For the police data—defined as a pedestrian injury reported to the police. For the teacher reports and survey—defined as a pedestrian injury resulting in at least a day off school.
Results: The estimated pedestrian injury rates per 100 000 person-years were 54.0 (95% CI 25.3 to 117.4), <53.97 (95% CI 23.8 to 125.9), 1878.8 (95% CI 1513.1 to 2322.4), and 764.0 (95% CI 523.3 to 1117.2) from the trauma registry, police data, teacher reports, and community survey, respectively.
Conclusions: Pedestrian injury rates differed significantly between different data sources. Users must be aware of the different target populations, definitions, and limitations of the data sources before direct comparisons are made. Injury reports by volunteer teachers may be a feasible source of injury data in other low/middle-income countries.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding: The study was funded by a CIHR grant “Child Pedestrian Injuries in Kampala: Data Sources and Determinants.” AM and PPSL were funded by the Department of Surgery at the University of Toronto. PPSL was additionally funded by Auto 21.
Competing interests: None.
Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained from the Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto in Canada.
Contributors: AWH conceived and designed the study, and is the guarantor of this paper. AM participated in study design, study implementation, data collection, and data analyses. MM and MN participated in the planning, supervision, and implementation of data collection. PPSL and LR participated in data analyses and manuscript composition. All of the authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.