Article Text

PDF
An empirical approach for defining acceptable levels of risk: a case study in team sports
  1. C W Fuller,
  2. C J Ward
  1. 1
    Centre for Sports Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  1. Dr C Fuller, Centre for Sports Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; colin.fuller{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives: To determine acceptable levels of risk in sport and to compare these with values used in occupational settings.

Design: Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study.

Settings: Seven soccer and 11 rugby union teams.

Subjects: 140 male athletes and 108 male and 100 female spectators associated with soccer and rugby union teams.

Main outcomes: Views on acceptable frequencies with which athletes sustain acute injuries of various levels of severity.

Results: The responses of athletes and spectators were similar, although spectators consistently indicated a higher acceptable frequency of injury than athletes. There were no significant differences in responses as a function of respondents’ gender and age. The results confirmed an inverse relationship between the acceptable frequency of occurrence and the severity of injury, although the relationships identified by the risk-averse and risk-taking minorities within the sample population were widely different.

Conclusion: The mean frequency–severity risk relationship identified by athletes and spectators in soccer and rugby was similar to the relationship routinely used for risk assessments in industry and commerce.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.