rss
Inj Prev 2007;13:334-338 doi:10.1136/ip.2007.015677
  • Original Article

Effects of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) standard on rates of machinery-related fatal occupational injury

  1. Maria T Bulzacchelli1,
  2. Jon S Vernick1,
  3. Daniel W Webster1,
  4. Peter S J Lees2
  1. 1
    Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  2. 2
    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  1. Dr M T Bulzacchelli, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; mbulzacc{at}jhsph.edu
  • Accepted 3 July 2007

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the United States’ federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) standard on rates of machinery-related fatal occupational injury. The standard, which took effect in 1990, requires employers in certain industries to establish an energy control program and sets minimum criteria for energy control procedures, training, inspections, and hardware.

Design: An interrupted time-series design was used to determine the standard’s effect on fatality rates. Machinery-related fatalities, obtained from the National Traumatic Occupational Fatalities surveillance system for 1980 through 2001, were used as a proxy for lockout/tagout-related fatalities. Linear regression was used to control for changes in demographic and economic factors.

Results: The average annual crude rate of machinery-related fatalities in manufacturing changed little from 1980 to 1989, but declined by 4.59% per year from 1990 to 2001. However, when controlling for demographic and economic factors, the regression model estimate of the standard’s effect is a small, non-significant increase of 0.05 deaths per 100 000 production worker full-time equivalents (95% CI −0.14 to 0.25). When fatality rates in comparison groups that should not have been affected by the standard are incorporated into the analysis, there is still no significant change in the rate of machinery-related fatalities in manufacturing.

Conclusions: There is no evidence that the lockout/tagout standard decreased fatality rates relative to other trends in occupational safety over the study period. A possible explanation is voluntary use of lockout/tagout by some employers before introduction of the standard and low compliance by other employers after.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This research was supported in part by funding from the NIOSH Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (No T42CCT310419). The funding agency had no involvement in the design of the study, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Abbreviations:
    GDP
    gross domestic product
    ICD
    International Classification of Diseases
    OSHA
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Injury Prevention.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Injury Prevention. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.