rss
Inj Prev 2007;13:173-177 doi:10.1136/ip.2006.014142
  • Original Article

Testing the risk compensation hypothesis for safety helmets in alpine skiing and snowboarding

  1. Michael D Scott1,
  2. David B Buller2,
  3. Peter A Andersen3,
  4. Barbara J Walkosz4,
  5. Jennifer H Voeks5,
  6. Mark B Dignan6,
  7. Gary R Cutter5
  1. 1California State University, Communication Arts and Sciences, Chico, California, USA
  2. 2Klein Buendel, Golden, Colorado, USA
  3. 3San Diego State University, School of Communication, San Diego, California, USA
  4. 4University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
  5. 5University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  6. 6Prevention Research Center, University of Kentucky, Kentucky, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor P Andersen
 San Diego State University, School of Communication, San Diego, CA 92182–4561, USA; peterand{at}mail.sdsu.edu
  • Accepted 25 November 2006

Abstract

Objective: The prevalence of helmet use by alpine skiers and snowboarders was estimated and self-reports on risk taking were assessed to test for potential risk compensation when using helmets in these sports.

Setting: Skiers and snowboarders were observed and interviewed at 34 resorts in the western United States and Canada.

Subjects: Respondents were 1779 adult skiers and snowboarders in the 2003 ski season.

Outcome measures: Observations of helmet use and questions about perceived speed and degree of challenge when not wearing a helmet (helmet wearers) or in previous ski seasons (non-helmet wearers).

Results: Helmet wearers reported that they skied/snowboarded at slower speeds (OR = 0.64, p<0.05) and challenged themselves less (OR = 0.76, p<0.05) than non-helmet wearers. Adoption of safety helmets in 2003 (23%) continued to increase over 2002 (OR = 0.46, p<0.05) and 2001 (OR = 0.84, p<0.05).

Conclusions: No evidence of risk compensation among helmet wearers was found. Decisions to wear helmets may be part of a risk reduction orientation. Helmet use continues to trend upwards but adoption may be slowing.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This project was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (CA81028).

  • Competing interests: None declared.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Official journal of ISCAIP and SAVIR