rss
Inj Prev 2006;12:253-257 doi:10.1136/ip.2006.011510
  • METHODOLOGIC ISSUES

The properties of the International Classification of the External Cause of Injury when used as an instrument for injury prevention research

  1. D Scott1,
  2. J Harrison2,
  3. D Purdie3,
  4. C Bain4,
  5. J Najman4,
  6. J Nixon5,
  7. A B Spinks4,
  8. R J McClure6
  1. 1Queensland Injury Surveillance Unit, Mater Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2Centre for Injury Research Studies, University of Adelaide, Australia
  3. 3Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  4. 4School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  5. 5School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  6. 6School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor R McClure
 School of Medicine, Griffith University, University Drive, Measdowbrook, Queensland, Australia 4131; r.mcclure{at}griffith.edu.au
  • Accepted 24 April 2006

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate properties of the International Classification of the External Cause of Injury (ICECI) as a tool for use in injury prevention research.

Methods: The Childhood Injury Prevention Study (CHIPS) is a prospective longitudinal follow up study of a cohort of 871 children 5–12 years of age, with a nested case crossover component. The ICECI is the latest tool in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) family and has been designed to improve the precision of coding injury events. The details of all injury events recorded in the study, as well as all measured injury related exposures, were coded using the ICECI. This paper reports a substudy on the utility and practicability of using the ICECI in the CHIPS to record exposures. Interrater reliability was quantified for a sample of injured participants using the Kappa statistic to measure concordance between codes independently coded by two research staff.

Results: There were 767 diaries collected at baseline and event details from 563 injuries and exposure details from injury crossover periods. There were no event, location, or activity details which could not be coded using the ICECI. Kappa statistics for concordance between raters within each of the dimensions ranged from 0.31 to 0.93 for the injury events and 0.94 and 0.97 for activity and location in the control periods.

Discussion: This study represents the first detailed account of the properties of the ICECI revealed by its use in a primary analytic epidemiological study of injury prevention. The results of this study provide considerable support for the ICECI and its further use.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    Official journal of ISCAIP and SAVIR