rss
Inj Prev 2006;12:166-170 doi:10.1136/ip.2005.011254
  • Original Article

Inequalities in hospital admission rates for unintentional poisoning in young children

  1. L Groom,
  2. D Kendrick,
  3. C Coupland,
  4. B Patel,
  5. J Hippisley-Cox
  1. School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 MsL Groom
 Division of Primary Care, School of Community Health Sciences, Floor 13, Tower Building, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; Lindsay.groom{at}nottingham.ac.uk
  • Accepted 14 March 2006

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relationship between deprivation and hospital admission rates for unintentional poisoning, by poisoning agent in children aged 0–4 years.

Design: Cross sectional study of routinely collected hospital admissions data.

Setting: East Midlands, UK.

Participants: 1469 admissions due to unintentional poisoning over two years.

Main outcome measure: Hospital admission rates for unintentional poisoning. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing hospital admission rates for poisoning in the most and least deprived electoral wards.

Results: Children in the most deprived wards had admission rates for medicinal poisoning that were 2–3 times higher than those in the least deprived wards (IRR 2.49, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.30). Admission rates for non-medicinal poisoning were about twice as high in the most compared to the least deprived wards (IRR 1.77, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.64). Deprivation gradients were particularly steep for benzodiazepines (IRR 5.63, 95% CI 1.72 to 18.40), antidepressants (IRR 4.58, 95% CI 1.80 to 11.66), cough and cold remedies (IRR 3.93, 95% CI 1.67 to 9.24), and organic solvents (IRR 3.69, 95% CI 1.83 to 7.44).

Conclusions: There are steep deprivation gradients for admissions to hospital for childhood poisoning, with particularly steep gradients for some psychotropic medicines. Interventions to reduce these inequalities should be directed towards areas of greater deprivation.

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: Grant from NHS Executive Trent and Broxtowe and Hucknall Primary Care Trust (NHS Research and Development support funding).

  • Competing interests: none.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Official journal of ISCAIP and SAVIR