Article Text


Roller coaster related fatalities, United States, 1994–2004
  1. A R Pelletier1,
  2. J Gilchrist2
  1. 1Division of Public Health Partnerships, National Center for Health Marketing, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
  2. 2Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr A R Pelletier
 Bureau of Health, Maine Department of Health and Human Services, 286 Water Street, Key Plaza, 8th Floor, 11 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0011;


Objective: To determine the number of fatalities related to roller coasters and examine factors common to multiple incidents.

Methods: A case was defined as the death of a person, which was associated with a roller coaster in the United States between 15 May 1994 and 14 May 2004. Cases were identified from four data sources: (1) Consumer Product Safety Commission, (2) Lexis-Nexis, (3) Medline, and (4) Saferparks.

Results: Forty people, ranging in age from 7 to 77 years, were killed in 39 separate incidents. Twenty nine (73%) deaths occurred among roller coaster patrons. Eleven fatalities resulted from external causes related to injuries from falls or collisions. Eighteen people died from medical conditions that might have been caused or exacerbated by riding a roller coaster; 15 were the result of intracranial hemorrhages or cardiac problems. Eleven (28%) deaths involved employees; all were caused by injuries.

Conclusions: Approximately four deaths annually in the United States are associated with roller coasters. Prevention of roller coaster fatalities is dependent on establishing an effective surveillance system for amusement ride injuries, engineering rides to better protect both patrons and employees, improving training and supervision of employees regarding safety precautions, and posting cautionary notices near roller coasters for people with specified medical conditions. Further research is needed on roller coaster related deaths resulting from intracranial hemorrhages and cardiac problems.

Statistics from

A roller coaster is as an amusement ride in which passengers are transported, often at high speeds, along an elevated railway, usually with sharp curves and steep inclines. The design features that provide a thrilling ride can result in severe injuries and death when a mishap occurs. No comprehensive system for monitoring injuries on amusement rides exists in the United States; however, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) estimated that 6900 non-occupational injuries requiring treatment in emergency departments occurred on amusement rides in 2003.1 Available data indicate that roller coasters account for 26% of injuries on amusement rides at fixed sites* and might be the leading cause of fatalities involving amusement rides.2,3 After the highly publicized death of a rider who fell from a roller coaster in Massachusetts in May 2004,4 we sought to identify all deaths related to roller coasters in the US during the past 10 years. Our objective was to document the magnitude of the problem and identify factors common to multiple incidents that might be amenable to prevention.


Roller coaster related deaths were identified from four data sources: (1) the CPSC, (2) Lexis-Nexis, a computerized database of newspapers, (3) Medline, a computerized database of medical journals, and (4) Saferparks, an advocacy group that promotes amusement park safety.5 CPSC obtained its data from multiple sources (for example, death certificates, newspaper articles, reports of incident investigations, medical examiners, and the public). To obtain information on roller coaster related fatalities we requested CPSC data on any deaths related to amusement rides. Newspaper reports in Lexis-Nexis were identified using the search terms “roller coaster” and “death”. Publications in Medline were identified using the search term “roller coaster”; we reviewed all articles that were listed as of 1 March 2005. Saferparks obtained its data from a 2002 survey of state and county agencies responsible for regulating amusement ride safety. Roller coaster related fatalities were identified by reviewing information from Saferparks’ online database.5 All fatalities reported by Saferparks that were not confirmed by another data source were verified by contacting the appropriate state or county agency that reported the death. After fatalities were identified, additional information was obtained, if needed, through follow up with CPSC and Saferparks and by conducting Internet searches.

A case was defined as the death of a person which was associated with a roller coaster in the United States between 15 May 1994 and 14 May 2004. Cause of death was categorized as a result of either external trauma or a medical condition based on available information. Deaths from external trauma were restricted to those with grossly obvious injuries. Data were abstracted by one author in a standard format and entered and analyzed in Epi Info 6.6 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined the study was exempt from institutional review board oversight because the study did not involve any living persons.


Forty deaths related to roller coasters were identified during the 10 year study period. Thirty (75%) deaths were identified from the CPSC, 29 (73%) from Lexis-Nexis, 11 (28%) from Saferparks, one (3%) from Medline,7 and one (3%) from another source. Twenty seven (68%) deaths were identified by at least two sources.

The 40 deaths were the result of 39 incidents. Thirty seven (93%) of the fatalities occurred on roller coasters at fixed sites. Deaths occurred in 20 states; five states (California (n = 8), Florida (n = 4), Ohio (n = 4), Nevada (n = 3), New Jersey (n = 3)) accounted for 55% of all deaths. One roller coaster had three fatalities as the result of separate incidents; no other roller coaster was associated with more than one fatal incident. Thirty two (80%) fatalities occurred during May through September. Decedents ranged in age from 7 to 77 years (median 29 years); 10 (25%) fatalities involved children <18 years of age (table 1). Twenty two (55%) decedents were female.

Table 1

 Roller coaster related fatalities, United States, 15 May 1994–14 May 2004

Twenty nine (73%) deaths occurred among roller coaster patrons (fig 1). Eleven people died from external causes (nine fell or were ejected from a roller coaster; one person standing on the ground was struck by a passenger in a moving roller coaster; and one person suffered blunt abdominal trauma after the roller coaster came to a sudden stop). Four of these 11 deaths were due to mechanical failure (for example, derailments and collisions), three to rider misconduct (for example, disabling safety devices or entering restricted areas), three to failure of restraint systems, and one to disputed causes (that is, rider misconduct versus failure of restraint system).

Figure 1

 Roller coaster related fatalities by type, United States, 15 May 1994–14 May 2004.

Eighteen people, 14 of whom were female, died from medical conditions that might have been caused or exacerbated by riding a roller coaster (eight intracranial hemorrhages, seven heart conditions, one asthma attack, one aortic laceration, and one unknown). Of these 18 deaths, five involved people who were aware of a pre-existing medical condition. Two of these had a history of heart disease; two who died of intracranial hemorrhages were on anticoagulants; and one had asthma.

Eleven (28%) deaths involved employees; all involved external causes related to injuries. Seven people were struck by roller coasters; two fell from heights; and two became entangled in moving equipment.


Approximately four deaths annually in the United States are associated with roller coasters. Although traumatic injuries resulting in the deaths of roller coaster patrons tend to receive the most media attention, they only represent one quarter of all fatalities. Approximately half of deaths associated with roller coasters occur from medical conditions in people without external signs of injury. The underlying cause of these deaths can be difficult to determine; however, a number of reports have documented similar, but non-fatal, neurological, vascular, and connective tissue problems related to riding roller coasters.8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 The remaining quarter of deaths associated with roller coasters are occupational fatalities, which often receive limited attention.

The overall number of roller coaster related fatalities from this case series is larger than what has been previously reported by other groups.3,5 This is due to the use of multiple data sources for reporting and the inclusion of both deaths from medical causes without external signs of trauma and occupational fatalities.

The lack of an effective system to monitor injuries and deaths involving roller coasters is part of a larger problem. No single agency has responsibility for tracking incidents involving amusement rides. The CPSC has authority for tracking injuries to patrons of amusement rides that are mobile3 but does not have legislative authority to track incidents on rides at fixed sites. This is often the responsibility of state or local agencies; however, a number of states have no regulations or specifically exempt large facilities from review.8 Occupational safety and health agencies, either at the state or federal level, monitor work related injuries. This approach to monitoring injuries results in a fragmented system that produces data of limited value from a public health perspective.

Quantifying the risk of death associated with roller coasters was not possible as there are no reliable estimates for the number of people riding roller coasters annually in the US. An industry trade group estimated that the injury risk for fixed site amusement rides compared favorably to other recreational activities;2 however, the public’s tolerance for risk may be lower for recreational activities in which the participant is passive (for example, riding a roller coaster) rather than active (for example, playing football). Although the number of deaths related to roller coasters is small in comparison to the leading causes of unintentional injury mortality (that is, motor vehicle crashes, falls, drowning), the public health impact is substantial when injuries for all types of amusement rides are considered.1,3 Efforts to improve safety for roller coasters would be applicable to other types of amusement rides and therefore could prevent a significant number of injuries and deaths.

This study is subject to at least four limitations. Firstly, case detection might have been incomplete. This might have been more of a problem for occupational fatalities because these deaths tended to generate less media attention, a major source for identifying cases. Secondly, we relied on the reporting sources to determine what constituted a roller coaster. This might have resulted in the inclusion of certain rides that were not characteristic of traditional roller coasters. Thirdly, limited information was available for many of the fatalities (for example, results of drug and alcohol testing were known for only two cases). The number of decedents who reportedly knew about pre-existing medical conditions represents a minimum estimate of the true prevalence. Fourthly, attributing deaths to roller coasters without external signs of trauma might overestimate the true number of cases. Three quarters of the deaths related to roller coasters that were the result of medical conditions were from heart disease and stroke, two of the three leading causes of death in this country. Temporal association alone does not prove causation.

Key points

  • This study is the first published case series of roller coaster related deaths.

  • Cases were identified using multiple data sources and included occupational fatalities.

  • Approximately one half of roller coaster related fatalities were due to external trauma.

  • The remaining deaths were the result of medical conditions, most often intracranial hemorrhage and cardiac problems.

  • Approaches to preventing roller coaster related fatalities are discussed.

On the basis of our findings, we make the following recommendations. Firstly, an effective surveillance system to monitor injuries and deaths related to amusement rides is needed. Much of the infrastructure for such a system already exists within the CPSC and state and local governments, but no agency has been given overall responsibility to coordinate efforts. Secondly, rides need to be engineered to better protect riders and employees. For example, rides might be designed to automatically shut down if a patron releases a restraint system or an employee leaves a designated safe area. Thirdly, enhanced training and supervision are needed for employees. This would likely improve safety for both employees and patrons. Fourthly, highly visible cautionary notices posted near roller coasters might alert those with specified medical conditions to avoid these rides. Finally, further research is needed on roller coaster related deaths resulting from intracranial hemorrhages and cardiac problems to determine what role, if any, roller coasters play in these deaths.


We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Kathy Fackler, Carol Firman, Vicky Leonard, Alice Pelletier, Leigh Ramsey, and Joyce Verdone.

 As principal investigator, Dr Pelletier had full access to all of the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Study concept and design: Pelletier, Gilchrist. Acquisition of data: Pelletier. Analysis and interpretation of data: Pelletier, Gilchrist. Drafting of the manuscript: Pelletier. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pelletier, Gilchrist.

View Abstract


  • * Amusement rides are categorized as fixed-site rides if they are permanently affixed to a site such as an amusement or theme park. Mobile rides are amusement rides that are moved from site to site as part of fairs and carnivals.

  • Funding: there was no external funding for this study. The work was conducted by federal employees with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Conflicts of interest: the authors report no conflicts of interest.

  • Role of funding source: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.