rss
Inj Prev 2004;10:103-106 doi:10.1136/ip.2003.004168
  • Original Article

Community paediatricians’ counseling patterns and knowledge of recommendations relating to child restraint use in motor vehicles

  1. J Rothenstein1,
  2. A Howard2,
  3. P Parkin3,
  4. A Khambalia3,
  5. C Macarthur3
  1. 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
  2. 2Division of Orthopaedic Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto
  3. 3Division of Paediatric Medicine (Paediatric Outcomes Research Team), Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Colin C Macarthur
 Division of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada; colin.macarthursickkids.ca

    Abstract

    Background: Road traffic injury is the leading cause of death among Canadian children and youth. Transport Canada recommends four types of child restraint depending on the size of the child, and recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of recommended restraint use.

    Objectives: To determine community paediatricians’ knowledge of Transport Canada recommendations for child restraint use in vehicles, and to examine paediatricians’ counseling patterns in relation to child passenger safety.

    Methods: A mailed questionnaire survey of all community paediatricians affiliated with the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto was conducted. A 16 item questionnaire gathered information on knowledge of Transport Canada recommendations for child restraint use, general counseling patterns in relation to child passenger safety, and demographic information.

    Results: In total, 60 community paediatricians in active practice were identified. Of these, 48 (80%) responded to the mailed questionnaire. Almost all paediatricians (92%) correctly identified the recommended weight for transition to a forward-facing car seat, whereas fewer paediatricians (63%) correctly identified the recommended weight for transition to a booster seat from a forward-facing car seat, and only one third of paediatricians correctly identified the recommended weight for transition from a booster seat to a seat belt.

    Conclusion: Community paediatricians’ knowledge of Transport Canada recommendations for child restraint use in vehicles is incomplete. There is a need for such recommendations to be better disseminated to paediatricians and parents so that information on child restraint use is delivered in a clear and consistent manner.

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    Official journal of ISCAIP and SAVIR