You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original research
How to analyse the injury based on 24Model: a case study of coal mine gas explosion injury
  1. Jing Li,
  2. Yaru Qin,
  3. Zhen Wang,
  4. Yanli Xin
  1. School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology Beijing Campus, Beijing, China
  1. Correspondence to Yaru Qin, School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology Beijing Campus, Beijing, China; qinyaru66{at}126.com

Abstract

Background Coal mine gas explosion injury has caused mass casualties, which have resulted in widespread concern.

Methods In order to prevent gas explosion injury in coal mine, 24Model is proposed to analyse the risk in this paper. 24Model is a human-oriented and organisation-oriented risk analysis method. Based on the 24Model, we propose a general procedure for analysing the causes of injury within the organisation.

Results A coal mine gas explosion case was analysed using the 24Model and the proposed analysis method, and the evolution of injury and the interaction of various causes was showed, and 6 unsafe conditions, 25 unsafe acts, 13 safety knowledge, 13 safety management systems and 13 safety cultures were obtained.

Conclusion Case analysis results show that by using the 24Model and analysis method the proposed effect can help employees to clearly see the evolution and identify the causes of the injury, to better understand the logical relationship with the causes of the injury, improve the effectiveness of training and effectively prevent similar injury. The case study provides a practical procedure for injury investigation and analysis, and thus, preventive measures can be made according to the various causations at different levels.

  • case study
  • process/impact evaluation
  • risk factor research
  • workplace
  • behavior

Data availability statement

No data are available.

https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2021-044281

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    No data are available.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors JL: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, supervision, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing, funding acquisition. YQ: conceptualisation, methodology, resources, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing-original draft, project administration. ZW: conceptualisation, methodology, resources, formal analysis, investigation, data curation. YX: resources, formal analysis, investigation, data curation.

    • Funding This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant numbers 2021YJSAQ12).

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.