|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EDITORIAL |
| Editorial |
Montreal Childrens Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Correspondence to:
Professor Pless;
barry.pless@mcgill.ca
Keywords: precautionary principle; risk factors; public health; regulations
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"As to diseases, make a habit of two thingsto help, or at least do no harm" (Hippocrates, The Epidemics)
"When an activity raises threats of harm to human health . . ., precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically" (Wingspread conference, 1998)
A fundamental teaching in clinical medicine is primum non nocerefirst do no harmthat is, when physicians face choices between uncertain benefits and possible harm, they must err on the side of safety.
In environmental public health a similar edict has emerged. The "precautionary principle", popularized 10 years ago in relation to environmental safety,1 is now increasingly accepted. It asserts that when there is suspected harm and the scientific evidence is inconclusive, the prescribed course is precautionary action. It is intended to apply when the harm is "serious, irreversible, and cumulative". The precautionary principle is the
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. E. Hagel, J. Marko, D. Dryden, A. B. Couperthwaite, J. Sommerfeldt, and B. H. Rowe Effect of bodychecking on injury rates among minor ice hockey players. Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 18, 2006; 175(2): 155 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Li Precautionary principle Inj. Prev., September 1, 2003; 9(3): 285 - 285. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pless A reply from SMARTRISK Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 15, 2003; 168(8): 966 - 966. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |