COMMENTARY
Black spots
Why we fight about black spots
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
P L Jacobsen
2771, 14th Street, Sacramento, California 95818, USA; jacobsenp@medscape.com
Accepted 4 October 2006
Injury preventionneed for a consensus between epidemiologists and traffic engineers
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In this issue, Morency and Cloutier1(see page 360) report that, over a 5-year period, motorists injured pedestrians at exactly one quarter of all intersections in central Montreal. Those of us alarmed over unsafe streets will not be surprised by this finding. But I suspect that many of those setting traffic policies will be.
That is because the roads agency in Montreal operates under a policy of fixing collision "black spots", where a "black spot" is an intersection with eight or more collisions in a 5-year period. Amazingly, seven motoristpedestrian collisions in 5 yearsthats one in every 260 daysis not enough to brand an intersection as dangerous. The black spots approach fixes only 1% of the intersections where a motorist hits a person.
The unspoken premise of this policy seems to be that a high frequency of collisions is evidence of design problems unique to that intersection.
Relevant Article
- From targeted "black spots" to area-wide pedestrian safety
- P Morency and M-S Cloutier
Inj. Prev. 2006 12: 360-364.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
