EDITORIAL
EDITORIAL
Are Editors free from bias? The special case of Letters to the Editor
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor I B Pless
Editor; barry.pless@mcgill.ca
Accepted 6 November 2006
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Readers may occasionally wonder whether an Editor can truly be unbiased when it comes to deciding what to publish. In general the answer is "probably not", but a better answer is that it depends on what sort of material we have in mind. In the old days, it was only print publications that concerned us. Nowadays, we need also to consider what is published electronically. For papers or similar material that may appear on websites, the decision-making process is almost identical to that used for print publication. The process of deciding which papers to publish has been well studied. I am convinced the peer review process minimizes some biases. But Letters to the Editor are an entirely different matter.
There are several types of letters. One is "Research letters". These are short communications addressed to the Editor that report data. In Injury Prevention, they were effectively the same
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Evidence on cycle helmets is contested, ambiguous and inconclusive.
- Peter W Ward
- IP Online, 2 Jan 2007 [Full text]
- Good data and constructive debate can help resolve controversial issues
- Dr Dorothy L Robinson
- IP Online, 18 Jan 2007 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
