IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 2005;11:259-260; doi:10.1136/ip.2005.010140
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanwick, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanwick, R

COMMENTARY

Cigarette fires

Canada gets its house in order

R Stanwick

Correspondence to:
Dr R Stanwick
Chief Medical Health Officer, Vancouver Island Health Authority, #430-1900 Richmond Avenue, Victoria, BC V8R 4R2, Canada; richard.stanwick@viha.ca


Canada’s parliamentarians pass Bill C-260, an amendment to the Hazardous Products Act creating a reduced ignition propensity cigarette

Keywords: advocacy; burns; cigarettes; legislation; smoking

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

It was not without some sense of historical irony that Liberal Member of Parliament in Canada, The Honourable John McKay, observed, while speaking in favor of a proposed legislative amendment, that in February 1916 much of Parliament burned to the ground. Although no official cause was ever provided, it was widely believed that a cigarette caused this fire.1

Andrew McGuire performs a great service in this issue of capturing the process that has led, after 30 years of struggle, to the introduction of safer cigarettes [see page 264]. The tactics he and his colleagues used are masterly and conjure up an image of a David and Goliath-like struggle to change the tobacco industry’s practises. In addition to admiring and acknowledging the skills displayed by McGuire, I confess to being one of his "thousands of advocates" who have also engaged the tobacco industry on this subject. For . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
R J O'Connor, J E Bauer, G A Giovino, D Hammond, A Hyland, G T Fong, and K M Cummings
Prevalence of behaviors related to cigarette-caused fires: a survey of Ontario smokers
Inj. Prev., August 1, 2007; 13(4): 237 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
F P Rivara
Injury prevention and poverty
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2005; 11(6): 384 - 384.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.