IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemenway, D
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hemenway, D
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M
Injury Prevention 2000;6:263-267
© 2000 BMJ Publishing Group


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Gun use in the United States: results from two national surveys

D Hemenway, D Azrael, M Miller

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Correspondence to:
Professor Hemenway
(hemenway{at}hsph.harvard.edu)

Objectives—To determine the relative incidence of gun victimization versus self defense gun use by civilians in the United States, and the circumstances and probable legality of the self defense uses.

Methods—National random digit dial telephone surveys of the adult population were conducted in 1996 and 1999. The Harvard surveys appear unique among private surveys in two respects: asking (1) open ended questions about defensive gun use incidents and (2) detailed questions about both gun victimization and self defense gun use. Five criminal court judges were asked to assess whether the self reported defensive gun uses were likely to have been legal.

Results—Even after excluding many reported firearm victimizations, far more survey respondents report having been threatened or intimidated with a gun than having used a gun to protect themselves. A majority of the reported self defense gun uses were rated as probably illegal by a majority of judges. This was so even under the assumption that the respondent had a permit to own and carry the gun, and that the respondent had described the event honestly.

Conclusions—Guns are used to threaten and intimidate far more often than they are used in self defense. Most self reported self defense gun uses may well be illegal and against the interests of society.


Keywords: firearms; guns; self defense; legality




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. McDowall
John R. Lott, Jr.'s Defensive Gun Brandishing Estimates
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2005; 69(2): 246 - 263.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
D. Hemenway and M. Miller
Gun Threats Against and Self-defense Gun Use by California Adolescents
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2004; 158(4): 395 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
J F Denton and W V Fabricius
Reality check: using newspapers, police reports, and court records to assess defensive gun use
Inj. Prev., April 1, 2004; 10(2): 96 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, October 6, 2003; 327(7418): E6 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
D Hemenway, D Azrael, and M Miller
National attitudes concerning gun carrying in the United States
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2001; 7(4): 282 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.