HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roseveare, C. A Articles by Chalmers, D. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roseveare, C. A Articles by Chalmers, D. J

An intervention to reduce playground equipment hazards

¹ Public Health Service, Hutt Valley Health, Wellington, New Zealand
² Injury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand

Correspondence and reprint requests to:
Christine Roseveare, Public Health Service, Hutt Valley Health, Private Bag 31–907 Lower Hutt, New Zealand
(e-mail: Christine.roseveare{at}hvh.co.nz).

Objectives—A community intervention trial was carried out to evaluate the relative effectiveness of two methods of reducing playground hazards in schools. The study hypotheses were: (1) a health promotion programme addressing barriers to implementing the New Zealand Playground Safety Standard will reduce playground hazards and (2) the intervention programme will be more successful than providing information alone.

Methods—Twenty four schools in Wellington, New Zealand were randomly allocated into two groups of 12 and their playgrounds audited for hazards. After the audit, the intervention group received a health promotion programme consisting of information about the hazards, an engineer's report, regular contact and encouragement to act on the report, and assistance in obtaining funding. The control group only received information about hazards in their playground.

Results—After 19 months, there was a significant fall in hazards in the intervention schools compared with the control schools (Mann-Whitney U test, p=0.027). No intervention schools had increased hazards and eight out of 12 had reduced them by at least three. In contrast, only two of the control schools had reduced their hazards by this amount, with three others increasing their hazards in that time.

Conclusions—It is concluded that working intensively with schools to overcome barriers to upgrading playground equipment can lead to a reduction in hazards, and that this form of intensive intervention is more effective than providing information alone.

Keywords: playground safety; health promotion; evaluation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Y. Moon, T. Calabrese, and L. Aird Reducing the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Child Care and Changing Provider Practices: Lessons Learned From a Demonstration Project Pediatrics, October 1, 2008; 122(4): 788 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. P Rivara Interdisciplinary research and randomized trials Inj. Prev., August 1, 2007; 13(4): 217 - 218. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Schwebel, A. L. Summerlin, M. L. Bounds, and B. A. Morrongiello The Stamp-in-Safety Program: A Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Behaviors that Can Lead to Unintentional Playground Injury in a Preschool Setting J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2006; 31(2): 152 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Norton, J Nixon, and J R Sibert Playground injuries to children Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 103 - 108. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M MacKay Playground injuries Inj. Prev., September 1, 2003; 9(3): 194 - 196. [Full Text] [PDF]