IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, B.

Injury Prevention, Vol 2, Issue 1 52-54, Copyright © 1996 by BMJ Publishing Group


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Dog bites: how big a problem?

J. J. Sacks, M. Kresnow and B. Houston
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the magnitude of the dog bite problem in the US. METHODS: Data on dog bites were gathered as part of a 1994 national telephone survey of 5,238 randomly dialed households. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: The weighted total number of dog bites was 4,494,083 (estimated incidence = 18/1,000 population); of these, 756,701 persons sustained bites necessitating medical attention (incidence rate = 3/1,000). Children had 3.2 times higher medically attended bite rates than adults (6.4/1,000 children v 2/1,000 adults). CONCLUSIONS: More attention and research needs to be devoted to the prevention of dog bites. Potential prevention strategies include: educational programs on canine behavior, especially directed at children; laws for regulating dangerous or vicious dogs; enhanced animal control programs; and educational programs regarding responsible dog ownership and training. Unfortunately, the relative or absolute effectiveness of any of these strategies has not been assessed. Continuing surveillance for dog bites will be needed if we are to better understand how to reduce the incidence of dog bites and evaluate prevention efforts.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
F. P Rivara
Interdisciplinary research and randomized trials
Inj. Prev., August 1, 2007; 13(4): 217 - 218.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
F Ostanello, A Gherardi, A Caprioli, L La Placa, A Passini, and S Prosperi
Incidence of injuries caused by dogs and cats treated in emergency departments in a major Italian city
Emerg. Med. J., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 260 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
K. A. Feldman, R. Trent, and M. T. Jay
Epidemiology of Hospitalizations Resulting From Dog Bites in California, 1991-1998
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2004; 94(11): 1940 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
J. M. Horan and S. Mallonee
Injury Surveillance
Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2003; 25(1): 24 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
J Ozanne-Smith, K Ashby, and V Z Stathakis
Dog bite and injury prevention--analysis, critical review, and research agenda
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2001; 7(4): 321 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Chapman, J. Cornwall, J. Righetti, and L. Sung
Preventing dog bites in children: randomised controlled trial of an educational intervention
BMJ, June 3, 2000; 320(7248): 1512 - 1513.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
I. GRANT and H. J. C. R. BELCHER
Injuries to the Hand from Dog Bites
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., February 1, 2000; 25(1): 26 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. J. C. Goldstein, D. M. Citron, and C. V. Merriam
Linezolid Activity Compared to Those of Selected Macrolides and Other Agents against Aerobic and Anaerobic Pathogens Isolated from Soft Tissue Bite Infections in Humans
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 1999; 43(6): 1469 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. J. C. Goldstein, D. M. Citron, C. V. Merriam, K. TyRrell, and Y. Warren
Activity of Gatifloxacin Compared to Those of Five Other Quinolones versus Aerobic and Anaerobic Isolates from Skin and Soft Tissue Samples of Human and Animal Bite Wound Infections
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 1999; 43(6): 1475 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. J. C. Goldstein, D. M. Citron, S. H. Gerardo, M. Hudspeth, and C. V. Merriam
Activities of HMR 3004 (RU 64004) and HMR 3647 (RU 66647) Compared to Those of Erythromycin, Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, Roxithromycin, and Eight Other Antimicrobial Agents against Unusual Aerobic and Anaerobic Human and Animal Bite Pathogens Isolated from Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Humans
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 1998; 42(5): 1127 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. B. Weiss, D. I. Friedman, and J. H. Coben
Incidence of Dog Bite Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments
JAMA, January 7, 1998; 279(1): 51 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1996 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.