IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 1996;2:47-51; doi:10.1136/ip.2.1.47
Copyright © 1996 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Doraiswamy, N. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stone, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Doraiswamy, N. V.

The Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) in the UK: a pilot study.

D. H. Stone, N. V. Doraiswamy

Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, UK.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility, strengths and weaknesses, and preventive utility of the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) in a paediatric setting in the UK. DESIGN: Implementation and operational evaluation of CHIRPP. SETTING: A paediatric accident and emergency department in Glasgow, Scotland, UK. METHODS: CHIRPP forms were used to collect and analyse data on the circumstances, mechanisms, and types of injuries in 2516 children (age range 0-13 years) presenting to the accident and emergency department over the period of 1 April 1993 to 31 January 1995. The strengths and weaknesses of CHIRPP were assessed by direct observation, discussion with staff, operation of the CHIRPP software, and scrutiny of the output. RESULTS: After initial technical problems, CHIRPP ran smoothly. Although parental compliance was high, staff compliance was low, and this resulted in a low capture rate. Tabulations indicated the potential of the system for identifying both hazardous environments and vulnerable population subgroups at whom specific preventive measures can be targeted. Specific proposals for enhancing the efficiency and preventive utility of CHIRPP in this setting were formulated. CONCLUSIONS: CHIRPP offers hospitals, public health departments, and government agencies in the UK a promising tool for planning national, regional, and local injury prevention.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
B. Pless
Surveillance alone is not the answer
Inj. Prev., August 1, 2008; 14(4): 220 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
D Shipton and D H Stone
The Yorkhill CHIRPP story: a qualitative evaluation of 10 years of injury surveillance at a Scottish children's hospital
Inj. Prev., August 1, 2008; 14(4): 245 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
E K Moll, A J Donoghue, E R Alpern, J Kleppel, D R Durbin, and F K Winston
Child bicyclist injuries: are we obtaining enough information in the emergency department chart?
Inj. Prev., June 1, 2002; 8(2): 165 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
P A Leonard, T F Beattie, and D R Gorman
Under representation of morbidity from paediatric bicycle accidents by official statistics--a need for data collection in the accident and emergency department
Inj. Prev., December 1, 1999; 5(4): 303 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
S. G Mackenzie and I. B. Pless
CHIRPP: Canada's principal injury surveillance program
Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 208 - 213.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A Morrison, D H Stone, N Doraiswamy, and L Ramsay
Injury surveillance in an accident and emergency department: a year in the life of CHIRPP
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 1999; 80(6): 533 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
A Morrison and D H Stone
Injury surveillance in accident and emergency departments: to sample or not to sample?
Inj. Prev., March 1, 1998; 4(1): 50 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
D H STONE, A MORRISON, and T T OHN
Developing injury surveillance in accident and emergency departments
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 1998; 78(2): 108 - 110.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1996 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.