IP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Injury Prevention 1996;2:36-40; doi:10.1136/ip.2.1.36
Copyright © 1996 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundelin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Troedsson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sundelin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Troedsson, K.

Information through television: does it promote child safety?

C. Sundelin, F. Rasmussen, R. Berfenstam, K. Troedsson

Department of Paediatrics, Uppsala University, Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate whether a local campaign to prevent childhood injuries increased parents' inclination to follow eight television programmes broadcast nationwide, and second, to assess whether parents reached by a local campaign benefitted more from the television programmes than those not reached by the campaign. METHODS: Before the television programmes were broadcast, all families with preschool children living in a typical Swedish municipality (the intervention area) received a letter from the head of the child health services encouraging them to watch the programmes. The local campaign also included face-to-face information and advice on childhood injuries at all day care centres and child health centres in the intervention area. After all the programmes had been broadcast, telephone interviews were conducted with one parent from 77% of all 1699 households with at least one preschool child in the intervention area, and with 87% of a random sample of 144 parents from other, similar municipalities. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The local campaign increased parents' inclination to follow the programmes. No significant association was found, however, between the number of programmes followed and measures undertaken in the homes as a direct consequence of the programmes. Nor was a significant association found between the number of programmes viewed and parents' attitudes towards risks. A local campaign may increase parents' awareness of information provided by the mass media on childhood injuries.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
L Aldoory and S Bonzo
Using communication theory in injury prevention campaigns
Inj. Prev., October 1, 2005; 11(5): 260 - 263.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
B. A. Morrongiello, L. Ondejko, and A. Littlejohn
Understanding Toddlers' In-Home Injuries: I. Context, Correlates, and Determinants
J. Pediatr. Psychol., September 1, 2004; 29(6): 415 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
E Towner, T Dowswell, and S Jarvis
Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 2
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2001; 7(3): 249 - 253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
E Towner, T Dowswell, and S Jarvis
Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 1
Inj. Prev., June 1, 2001; 7(2): 161 - 164.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1996 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.